…nger exist. — Marco Aurelio 18:01, 2 February 2016 (UTC) On 10 August 2014, the Wikimedia Foundation added a " superprotect " right – granted to the "staff" global user group – which can make pages uneditable even for administrators, hence creating a new hierarchy where administr…

…n one direction or another. Black Kite (talk) 21:54, 29 September 2022 (UTC) So Wikipedia should have religious tests for certain actions? And are you implying that leftists can't be religious? Besides being "not appropriate or relevant" as Mr Ernie said, I think it's more a viol…

Commons:Village pump/Archive/2015/03 - Wikimedia Commons Jump to content From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository Commons:Village pump Archive Latest comment: 11 years ago by Ktr101 in topic First concrete bridge and Budapest metro line 1 This is an archive of past discu…

… 29 January 2026 (UTC) Reply Global trends have continued to shape not only the Wikimedia projects, but the broader internet. We want to hear more about how those trends are affecting you and how you think we should respond. What are the most important changes you’re noticing in …

… 29 January 2026 (UTC) Reply Global trends have continued to shape not only the Wikimedia projects, but the broader internet. We want to hear more about how those trends are affecting you and how you think we should respond. What are the most important changes you’re noticing in …

…soon. Candidates from the community are needed to fill the available seats. The Wikimedia Foundation Board of Trustees oversees the Wikimedia Foundation's operations. Community trustees and appointed trustees make up the Board of Trustees. Each trustee serves a three year term. T…

…Recoding life in common: a critical approach of post-nature 301 Eric Deibel The wiki way: prefiguring change, practicing democracy 327 Kate Milberry Tailoring rights regimes in biotechnology: introducing DRIPS next to TRIPS 345 Niels Louwaars About the authors 357 Index 361 12 Re…

… like a bad idea, but actually seems like it could pose a fundamental threat to Wikipedia. If that sounds like an overreaction, let me explain. The point of this feature is that it would warn people when they're about to make a non-neutral edit. That sounds like a great idea in t…

Thank you for participating in the first phase of the 2017 Wikimedia movement strategy process . The text of the strategic direction has now been finalized. New comments will contribute to the next phase of discussions. This refers to: drafts A , G , K Structural inequalities: Sh…

…the debate may be found at the bottom of the page. In order to remain listed at Wikipedia:Requests for comment , at least two people need to show that they tried to resolve a dispute with this sysop and have failed. This must involve the same dispute, not different disputes. The …

… or other issues, so people know these should be focused on. Possibly sorted by WikiProject (Music, TV, Football, etc) so we can work on topics that interest us that are also considered very important. This could be a regular post somewhere (Diff?) or twice yearly report. Whateve…

… or other issues, so people know these should be focused on. Possibly sorted by WikiProject (Music, TV, Football, etc) so we can work on topics that interest us that are also considered very important. This could be a regular post somewhere (Diff?) or twice yearly report. Whateve…

…g the talk pages of drafts, so they get put in the various WP:AALERTS notice of Wikiprojects. It works pretty well at WP:JOURNALS and WP:WPWIR and other involved projects. Headbomb { t · c · p · b } 19:56, 15 February 2020 (UTC) I don't see what benefit the current use of draft s…

…p a page to organise how best to tackle improving the Penwith pages here , as a wikiproject - feel free to add your name to the list. there isn't much there yet as we haven't had much time to organise lists of things to do yet, but the idea is to write down a list of things that …

…nge much, but I think we should use the latest Creative Commons license because Wikimedia may get in trouble otherwise. -- RafChem ( talk ) 16:26, 23 October 2016 (UTC) Reply First of all, Wikimedia won't get in trouble for sticking with the existing terms. Secondly: fair enough …