…ty is blatantly bureaucratic and is definitely bad faith, and goes against what Wikipedia stands for. Community consensus should be the the final say on content, not an elected body that we have to hope are doing the right thing. Kirbanzo ( userpage - talk - contribs ) 14:23, 17 …
…ped by SIL2 , and ELAN3 which helps with multi- text annotations wrapped into a wiki which serves as media annotation, this group of applications is prob- a general entrance port and collaboration tool. The ably the best known set of linguistic tools specialised system is loaded …
… 29 January 2026 (UTC) Reply Global trends have continued to shape not only the Wikimedia projects, but the broader internet. We want to hear more about how those trends are affecting you and how you think we should respond. What are the most important changes you’re noticing in …
… 29 January 2026 (UTC) Reply Global trends have continued to shape not only the Wikimedia projects, but the broader internet. We want to hear more about how those trends are affecting you and how you think we should respond. What are the most important changes you’re noticing in …
…p could exchange opinions with each other and with their supervisors by using a wiki. Finally, students’ reflections on their experiences are shown and changes for the future in this ongoing project are considered. 2012年夏期にオーストラリアにおいて行われた海外教育実習プログラムの構成および内 容について記述します。このプログラムは小学校、…
…n (talk) 19:20, 22 August 2013 (UTC) [ reply ] I gather you haven't seen Slate? Wikipedia Beats Major News Organizations, Perfectly Reflects Chelsea Manning’s New Gender L iz Let's Talk 20:07, 22 August 2013 (UTC) [ reply ] There is no conceivable reason for us to want to garner …
Wikisource:Proposed deletions/Archives/2024 - Wikisource, the free online library Jump to content From Wikisource Wikisource:Proposed deletions Archives Latest comment: 5 months ago by Alien333 in topic Sir Gawain and the Green Knight (Middle English) Please do not post any new c…
Wikipedia talk:Flagged protection and patrolled revisions/Poll - Wikipedia Jump to content From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Wikipedia talk:Flagged protection and patrolled revisions Pending changes discussions Poll 2009 RfC 2010 Poll 2010 Interim RfC 2011 Phase 1 Phase 2 Pha…
…These shortcuts are made possible by "template redirects": a non-intuitive MediaWiki hack where " transcluding " a redirect is equivalent to "transcluding" its target page. Template:Cn is a redirect to Template:Citation needed , the same way United States of America is a redirect…
…, we determine which articles are to be featured articles (FAs) . FAs exemplify Wikipedia's very best work and satisfy the FA criteria . All editors are welcome to review nominations ; please see the review FAQ . Before nominating an article, nominators may wish to receive feedba…
…, we determine which articles are to be featured articles (FAs) . FAs exemplify Wikipedia's very best work and satisfy the FA criteria . All editors are welcome to review nominations ; please see the review FAQ . Before nominating an article, nominators may wish to receive feedba…
…7 Re-inventing Beethoven 125 51 VeleHanden 131 28 The Danish West-Indies 125 52 Wikidocumentaries 131 29 Scribes of the Cairo Geniza 125 53 Depictathons 132 30 Fishing in the past 125 54 Wiki Loves X 132 31 Project PHaEDRA 126 55 Fortepan Iowa 132 32 Macdonald Dictionary 126 56 P…
…y Gregor Thurmair 16.00 – 16.30 The TRANSBey Prototype: An Online Collaborative Wiki-Based CAT Environment for Volunteer Translators, by Youcef Bey, Christian Boitet and Kyo Kageura ii 16.30 – 17.00 Coffee break 17.00 – 17.30 Corpógrafo – Applications, by Belinda Maia and Luís Sa…
…aborate. — Justin ( ko a vf ) ❤ T ☮ C ☺ M ☯ 00:10, 13 March 2026 (UTC) Reply On wikis, the custom is to take more into account than just the raw number of votes on either side. That's why the term " !vote " is used in discussions here. A bare "support" or "oppose" doesn't carry a…
…ely make anyone elaborate. — Justin ( ko vf 00:10, 13 March 2026 (UTC) Reply On wikis, the custom is to take more into account than just the raw number of votes on either side. That's why the term " !vote " is used in discussions here. A bare "support" or "oppose" doesn't carry a…