This discussion is being opened by the Wikimedia Foundation to determine how it can support the English Wikipedia community on its decision (if any) relating to the protest of the Stop Online Piracy Act . The purpose of this discussion is to gauge whether consensus is emerging fo…

Commons:Deletion requests/All files copyrighted in the US under the URAA - Wikimedia Commons Jump to content From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository Commons:Deletion requests This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can r…

This is a project page to determine what action is required on the part of the Wikipedia community regarding the Stop Online Piracy Act (SOPA) and our response to it (if any). Jimmy Wales asked for community input on a possible database lock, similar to what the Italian Wikipedia…

This is a project page to determine what action is required on the part of the Wikipedia community regarding the Stop Online Piracy Act (SOPA) and our response to it (if any). Jimmy Wales asked for community input on a possible database lock, similar to what the Italian Wikipedia…

…rovide a rich resource -all in English. While a few sentences can be sourced to Wikipedia, each paper overall has offered to the rest of the world in English valuable insights. The Paper on e-learning in Russia, for example, cites 18 references and all of these are references to …

… ( RFC on next steps), Summary of public discussions ( 2 online consultations , Wikimania workshop upcoming) Section in progress. This is a wiki, please edit to include links to any discussion that is not yet there. Editors spend a lot of time reading, writing, and reviewing mate…

…es the electromagnetic force. The best description I’ve found so far comes from Wikipedia: viz., photons are ‘chunked ripples in a field, or “excitations”, that “look like” particles’ (Wikipedia s.v.; emphasis added). That is, a photon can be considered as a discretely located (w…

…, we determine which articles are to be featured articles (FAs) . FAs exemplify Wikipedia's very best work and satisfy the FA criteria . All editors are welcome to review nominations ; please see the review FAQ . Before nominating an article, nominators may wish to receive feedba…

Wikipedia:Geselshoekie/Argief2020 - Wikipedia Gaan na inhoud in Wikipedia, die vrye ensiklopedie Wikipedia:Geselshoekie Hierdie bladsy dien as 'n argief van ou besprekings. Moenie die inhoud van hierdie bladsy wysig nie. Indien u 'n nuwe bespreking wil begin, of by een van die ou…

Commons:Requests for comment/MP4 Video - Wikimedia Commons Jump to content From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository < Commons:Requests for comment Translate this page This discussion is now closed and archived. Please do not modify it. Closing with consensus prefer no MP…

Commons:Requests for comment/MP4 Video - Wikimedia Commons Jump to content From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository < Commons:Requests for comment Translate this page This discussion is now closed and archived. Please do not modify it. Closing with consensus prefer no MP…

…p a page to organise how best to tackle improving the Penwith pages here , as a wikiproject - feel free to add your name to the list. there isn't much there yet as we haven't had much time to organise lists of things to do yet, but the idea is to write down a list of things that …

…zed’. Some people can even sacrifice their lives for what they belong to. Also, Wikipedia, by providing values related to intellect/knowledge, is also gaining a great deal of attention. There could be a plenty of samples for the social/value design in business. A sample case is t…

…aborate. — Justin ( ko a vf ) ❤ T ☮ C ☺ M ☯ 00:10, 13 March 2026 (UTC) Reply On wikis, the custom is to take more into account than just the raw number of votes on either side. That's why the term " !vote " is used in discussions here. A bare "support" or "oppose" doesn't carry a…

…ely make anyone elaborate. — Justin ( ko vf 00:10, 13 March 2026 (UTC) Reply On wikis, the custom is to take more into account than just the raw number of votes on either side. That's why the term " !vote " is used in discussions here. A bare "support" or "oppose" doesn't carry a…