Wikipedia talk:Flagged protection and patrolled revisions/Poll - Wikipedia Jump to content From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Wikipedia talk:Flagged protection and patrolled revisions Pending changes discussions Poll 2009 RfC 2010 Poll 2010 Interim RfC 2011 Phase 1 Phase 2 Pha…
…nge much, but I think we should use the latest Creative Commons license because Wikimedia may get in trouble otherwise. -- RafChem ( talk ) 16:26, 23 October 2016 (UTC) Reply First of all, Wikimedia won't get in trouble for sticking with the existing terms. Secondly: fair enough …
…s, so we can read it by ourselves. I do not think template should be mentioning wikipedia pages which could be changing but such link should be listed in the warning/discussion below the template.-- Jarekt ( talk ) 04:26, 14 June 2008 (UTC) Reply License templates are not to educ…
…s, so we can read it by ourselves. I do not think template should be mentioning wikipedia pages which could be changing but such link should be listed in the warning/discussion below the template.-- Jarekt ( talk ) 04:26, 14 June 2008 (UTC) Reply License templates are not to educ…
Hello, Slaporte (WMF). Welcome to the Wikimedia Meta-Wiki ! This website is for coordinating and discussing all Wikimedia projects . You may find it useful to read our policy page . If you are interested in doing translations, visit Meta:Babylon . You can also leave a note on Met…
Hello, Slaporte (WMF). Welcome to the Wikimedia Meta-Wiki ! This website is for coordinating and discussing all Wikimedia projects . You may find it useful to read our policy page . If you are interested in doing translations, visit Meta:Babylon . You can also leave a note on Met…
A trend I am observing on Wikipedia is excessive paranoia about copyright infringements. While a certain amount of preventive action is certainly necessary, I strongly oppose simply deleting an entry for "presumed" copyright violations. Examples: An entry which contains a few cop…
A trend I am observing on Wikipedia is excessive paranoia about copyright infringements. While a certain amount of preventive action is certainly necessary, I strongly oppose simply deleting an entry for "presumed" copyright violations. Examples: An entry which contains a few cop…
A trend I am observing on Wikipedia is excessive paranoia about copyright infringements. While a certain amount of preventive action is certainly necessary, I strongly oppose simply deleting an entry for "presumed" copyright violations. Examples: An entry which contains a few cop…
A trend I am observing on Wikipedia is excessive paranoia about copyright infringements. While a certain amount of preventive action is certainly necessary, I strongly oppose simply deleting an entry for "presumed" copyright violations. Examples: An entry which contains a few cop…
Wikisource:Scriptorium/Archives/Sep 2005 - Dec 2005 - Wikisource Jump to content From Wikisource Wikisource:Scriptorium No dumps for subdomains edit At the dumps get smaller and smaller because of the creation of subdomains, but no dumps for the subdomains are available. Where ca…
…to move forward and avoid letting the RFC be forgotten in a dusty corner of the wiki, it's now time to close and summarize it. The goal of the RFC was to gauge interest in simplifying our development toolchain and consolidating our tools (gitblit, Gerrit, Jenkins, Bugzilla, RT, T…
…gging, deletion etc.) regarding images on Commons and posting them to the local wikis using the specific image. See User:Duesentrieb/Tools for other tools I wrote. Please use the talk page for questions and comments. If I do not respond, please leave a quick note on my talk page …
…hing Children Mathematics 5 (November 1998): 164-170” is allowed posting on the wikibook? If yes, how can I obtain the permission from the author? Thank you in advance! This is essentially the same situation as with your other question above. Unless this article has been spefical…
…al government works is sometimes difficult to determine, but keeps coming up on Wikipedia again and again. There are some easy cases: works of the United States federal government , for example, are not protected by copyright and are thus in the public domain . The same does not …