…ty is blatantly bureaucratic and is definitely bad faith, and goes against what Wikipedia stands for. Community consensus should be the the final say on content, not an elected body that we have to hope are doing the right thing. Kirbanzo ( userpage - talk - contribs ) 14:23, 17 …
…soon. Candidates from the community are needed to fill the available seats. The Wikimedia Foundation Board of Trustees oversees the Wikimedia Foundation's operations. Community trustees and appointed trustees make up the Board of Trustees. Each trustee serves a three year term. T…
…ges that indicate precisely which comment the user was replying to 5 May 2020 ptwiki busted 18 may 2020 Display editnotices 28 May 2020 Can't handle SineBot-signed posts 14 Sep 2020 Additional link to reply to the original post at the end of a section 21 Nov 2020 Apologies if thi…
This is an archive of past discussions about Wikipedia . Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page . I'm a Wikipedia veteran who made a brief speech about how Wikipedia works, its power…
A 2008 study found that Wikipedians were less agreeable, open, and conscientious than others… We seem plenty conscientious—otherwise why would we be here? :?) And I feel it's important to be "open" to being wrong (as long as it's verifiable). But why would anyone expect a good ed…