…ty is blatantly bureaucratic and is definitely bad faith, and goes against what Wikipedia stands for. Community consensus should be the the final say on content, not an elected body that we have to hope are doing the right thing. Kirbanzo ( userpage - talk - contribs ) 14:23, 17 …
WP:CBAN currently says, Community sanctions may be discussed on the Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard (preferred) or on Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents. In a discussion that's happening now at WP:AN#Good Article ban proposal , there's confusion about what may …
…laces. Other candidates who applied here will be selected by affiliates and the Wikimedia Foundation during a separate process in the same period. Election-chosen members [ edit ] The top seven ranking candidates in the open elections will be announced on 31 October 2021 or later…
…ges that indicate precisely which comment the user was replying to 5 May 2020 ptwiki busted 18 may 2020 Display editnotices 28 May 2020 Can't handle SineBot-signed posts 14 Sep 2020 Additional link to reply to the original post at the end of a section 21 Nov 2020 Apologies if thi…
On 10 June 2019, an English Wikipedia administrator was banned by the Wikimedia Foundation (WMF) from editing the English Wikipedia for a period of 1 year. A large community discussion followed, which included various statements by stakeholders , including the Trust & Safety depa…
…g the talk pages of drafts, so they get put in the various WP:AALERTS notice of Wikiprojects. It works pretty well at WP:JOURNALS and WP:WPWIR and other involved projects. Headbomb { t · c · p · b } 19:56, 15 February 2020 (UTC) I don't see what benefit the current use of draft s…
…is not easily understood by many readers. For an example, see [1] To say that a Wikimedia project has a "Systemic problem" is a fancy way of saying that an entire system has a problem. One could simply say: "Severe problems that affect an entire project" to describe the Big-Endia…
…laces. Other candidates who applied here will be selected by affiliates and the Wikimedia Foundation during a separate process in the same period. Election-chosen members [ edit ] The top seven ranking candidates in the open elections will be announced on 31 October 2021 or later…
View or translate summary report The Wikimedia Foundation is seeking input about the application of the Universal Code of Conduct . The goal of this consultation is to help outline clear enforcement pathways for a drafting committee to design proposals for a comprehensive communi…
View or translate summary report The Wikimedia Foundation is seeking input about the application of the Universal Code of Conduct . The goal of this consultation is to help outline clear enforcement pathways for a drafting committee to design proposals for a comprehensive communi…
View or translate summary report The Wikimedia Foundation is seeking input about the application of the Universal Code of Conduct . The goal of this consultation is to help outline clear enforcement pathways for a drafting committee to design proposals for a comprehensive communi…
… this article was written in the authors' roles as academics and I do not think Wikipedia should be sanctioning an academic for writing in a reputable journal on a topic of their study. So we're left with a talk page rant that has been peer-reviewed in a reputable journal allegin…