Hello, Superpes15. Welcome to the Wikimedia Meta-Wiki ! This website is for coordinating and discussing all Wikimedia projects . You may find it useful to read our policy page . If you are interested in doing translations, visit Meta:Babylon . You can also leave a note on Meta:Ba…

Hello, Superpes15. Welcome to the Wikimedia Meta-Wiki ! This website is for coordinating and discussing all Wikimedia projects . You may find it useful to read our policy page . If you are interested in doing translations, visit Meta:Babylon . You can also leave a note on Meta:Ba…

…r-faith disruption from this single user ascends everything I have ever seen on Wikipedia entirely, so I am merely going to scratch the surface here. Make no mistake though; this disruption is blatant , systematic , and severe . Major recognition deserves to go to the team of edi…

…oposal. Theo10011 ( talk ) 21:55, 9 June 2013 (UTC) The following is a proposed Wikimedia model guideline for WMF public wikis. The proposal currently has the following status: closed. Please see the summary subpage for translations. Comment was scheduled to close on 21 May 2013 …

…oposal. Theo10011 ( talk ) 21:55, 9 June 2013 (UTC) The following is a proposed Wikimedia model guideline for WMF public wikis. The proposal currently has the following status: closed. Please see the summary subpage for translations. Comment was scheduled to close on 21 May 2013 …

…mance , please delete deasaich an tùs Sorry, i don't speak the language of this Wikipedia and could not find the Template for Deletion-Requests. However i would like to inform you that the Article The Flowers Of Romance is an hoax, see and commons:Commons:Village_pump#Hoax Articl…

…nge much, but I think we should use the latest Creative Commons license because Wikimedia may get in trouble otherwise. -- RafChem ( talk ) 16:26, 23 October 2016 (UTC) Reply First of all, Wikimedia won't get in trouble for sticking with the existing terms. Secondly: fair enough …

…nger exist. — Marco Aurelio 18:01, 2 February 2016 (UTC) On 10 August 2014, the Wikimedia Foundation added a " superprotect " right – granted to the "staff" global user group – which can make pages uneditable even for administrators, hence creating a new hierarchy where administr…

…rting point for the conversation or bring your own. Thank you! On behalf of the Wikimedia Foundation’s Security team — Samuel (WMF) ( talk ) 00:50, 5 June 2023 (UTC) Reply A security-wise less educated user can probably not understand the scope of the risks from these explanation…

… like a bad idea, but actually seems like it could pose a fundamental threat to Wikipedia. If that sounds like an overreaction, let me explain. The point of this feature is that it would warn people when they're about to make a non-neutral edit. That sounds like a great idea in t…

…is not easily understood by many readers. For an example, see [1] To say that a Wikimedia project has a "Systemic problem" is a fancy way of saying that an entire system has a problem. One could simply say: "Severe problems that affect an entire project" to describe the Big-Endia…

… topic was opened with the focus on the actions of mainly one user on the Scots Wikipedia. His actions, albeit well-intentioned, nonetheless exposed a large vulnerability not just in the Scots Wiki, but small language Wikis in general. The conversation that followed quickly turne…

…ions for the previous few months. The community needs to complete required MediaWiki interface translations in that language ( about localization , translatewiki , check completion ). The community needs to discuss and complete the settings table below: What Value Example / Expla…

…ions for the previous few months. The community needs to complete required MediaWiki interface translations in that language ( about localization , translatewiki , check completion ). The community needs to discuss and complete the settings table below: What Value Example / Expla…

…pacity there even thought we aren't hurting for x86_64 builders. Bots found the wiki Yesterday our wiki was up and down in the morning. Seems scrapers not only found the wiki, but also found that they could query time ranges for changes in Special:RecentChanges. We put in some bl…