…n one direction or another. Black Kite (talk) 21:54, 29 September 2022 (UTC) So Wikipedia should have religious tests for certain actions? And are you implying that leftists can't be religious? Besides being "not appropriate or relevant" as Mr Ernie said, I think it's more a viol…

…petã Eho kuatia retepýpe Vikipetãmegua Último comentario: hace 20 días por MediaWiki message delivery en el tema Action Required: Update templates/modules for electoral maps (Migrating from P1846 to P14226) Bot flag requests/Pedidos para autorización de bots Here/Aquí Caracteres …

Wikipedia:Editor's index to Wikipedia - Wikipedia Jump to content From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Community portal Dashboard Departments Maintenance Tasks Discord IRC Matrix.org Meetups Directories ( Protocols Essays How-to Index Noticeboards AI WikiProjects ) Shortcuts WP:…

Wikipedia:Geselshoekie/Argief2018 - Wikipedia Gaan na inhoud in Wikipedia, die vrye ensiklopedie Wikipedia:Geselshoekie Hierdie bladsy dien as 'n argief van ou besprekings. Moenie die inhoud van hierdie bladsy wysig nie. Indien u 'n nuwe bespreking wil begin, of by een van die ou…

…scussion will be moved to the talk page. Background statement [ edit ] Does the Wikipedia community support the concept of date autoformatting? Scope Autoformatting is a way of marking up dates to allow registered users to choose their preferred display format. A variety of metho…

Wikipedia talk:Flagged protection and patrolled revisions/Poll - Wikipedia Jump to content From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Wikipedia talk:Flagged protection and patrolled revisions Pending changes discussions Poll 2009 RfC 2010 Poll 2010 Interim RfC 2011 Phase 1 Phase 2 Pha…

… like a bad idea, but actually seems like it could pose a fundamental threat to Wikipedia. If that sounds like an overreaction, let me explain. The point of this feature is that it would warn people when they're about to make a non-neutral edit. That sounds like a great idea in t…

Wikipedia:Nyhetsbrev – Wikipedia Hoppa till innehållet Från Wikipedia Nyhetsbrev från Wikimediarörelsen . Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #218 is out: Wikifunctions available on 123 Wiktionary languages [ redigera | redigera wikitext ] There is a new update for Wiki…

… topic was opened with the focus on the actions of mainly one user on the Scots Wikipedia. His actions, albeit well-intentioned, nonetheless exposed a large vulnerability not just in the Scots Wiki, but small language Wikis in general. The conversation that followed quickly turne…

User talk:Patsw - Wikipedia Jump to content From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Please sign and date your entries by inserting -- ~~~~ at the end. Discussion of Contributions of Patsw edit patsw 01:46, 17 Jan 2005 (UTC) I like your re-introduction of the Zogby poll, and I think…

…, we determine which articles are to be featured articles (FAs) . FAs exemplify Wikipedia's very best work and satisfy the FA criteria . All editors are welcome to review nominations ; please see the review FAQ . Before nominating an article, nominators may wish to receive feedba…

…, we determine which articles are to be featured articles (FAs) . FAs exemplify Wikipedia's very best work and satisfy the FA criteria . All editors are welcome to review nominations ; please see the review FAQ . Before nominating an article, nominators may wish to receive feedba…

…p a page to organise how best to tackle improving the Penwith pages here , as a wikiproject - feel free to add your name to the list. there isn't much there yet as we haven't had much time to organise lists of things to do yet, but the idea is to write down a list of things that …

…aborate. — Justin ( ko a vf ) ❤ T ☮ C ☺ M ☯ 00:10, 13 March 2026 (UTC) Reply On wikis, the custom is to take more into account than just the raw number of votes on either side. That's why the term " !vote " is used in discussions here. A bare "support" or "oppose" doesn't carry a…

…ely make anyone elaborate. — Justin ( ko vf 00:10, 13 March 2026 (UTC) Reply On wikis, the custom is to take more into account than just the raw number of votes on either side. That's why the term " !vote " is used in discussions here. A bare "support" or "oppose" doesn't carry a…