…nger exist. — Marco Aurelio 18:01, 2 February 2016 (UTC) On 10 August 2014, the Wikimedia Foundation added a " superprotect " right – granted to the "staff" global user group – which can make pages uneditable even for administrators, hence creating a new hierarchy where administr…
On 10 June 2019, an English Wikipedia administrator was banned by the Wikimedia Foundation (WMF) from editing the English Wikipedia for a period of 1 year. A large community discussion followed, which included various statements by stakeholders , including the Trust & Safety depa…
…ion of their choice under § Other discussions . In the first phase, the English Wikipedia was registered as a single "participant group"; this is to be the same in Phase 2. About 100 editors participated in the local discussion , and more than 300 other editors participated elsew…
… and after this date. See current discussion . February Request bot flag for pl:Wikipedysta:Margosbot . Public anouncement: pl:Wikipedia:Bar#Status bota dla Wikipedysta:Margosbot . I'm inserting new interwiki links to articles. As for now I've put them into over 2000 articles (us…
…n one direction or another. Black Kite (talk) 21:54, 29 September 2022 (UTC) So Wikipedia should have religious tests for certain actions? And are you implying that leftists can't be religious? Besides being "not appropriate or relevant" as Mr Ernie said, I think it's more a viol…
… topic was opened with the focus on the actions of mainly one user on the Scots Wikipedia. His actions, albeit well-intentioned, nonetheless exposed a large vulnerability not just in the Scots Wiki, but small language Wikis in general. The conversation that followed quickly turne…
… topic was opened with the focus on the actions of mainly one user on the Scots Wikipedia. His actions, albeit well-intentioned, nonetheless exposed a large vulnerability not just in the Scots Wiki, but small language Wikis in general. The conversation that followed quickly turne…
…s and smokescreens by Slowking will never help their case. The abuse of certain wikis is extensive, and especially if you want to argue that a block should be void because every admin from 5 different wikis gave you an involved block, you can't particularly do that while creating…
… ( RFC on next steps), Summary of public discussions ( 2 online consultations , Wikimania workshop upcoming) Section in progress. This is a wiki, please edit to include links to any discussion that is not yet there. Editors spend a lot of time reading, writing, and reviewing mate…
…hough not everyone may be able to see the relevance). Lastly, I am not big into wiki bureaucracy and did not even remember what autopatrolling even is, and trying to look up that useful 101-level information at WT:Autopatrollers was fruitless because it isn't even explained there…
…hough not everyone may be able to see the relevance). Lastly, I am not big into wiki bureaucracy and did not even remember what autopatrolling even is, and trying to look up that useful 101-level information at WT:Autopatrollers was fruitless because it isn't even explained there…
…ty is blatantly bureaucratic and is definitely bad faith, and goes against what Wikipedia stands for. Community consensus should be the the final say on content, not an elected body that we have to hope are doing the right thing. Kirbanzo ( userpage - talk - contribs ) 14:23, 17 …
Blog, Podcast, Vodcast and Wiki Copyright Guide for Australia Anthony Austin, Jessica Coates, Hannah Donnelly, and Professor Brian Fitzgerald assisted by Peter Black, Kylie Pappalardo, Nic Suzor and Emma Carroll This Guide is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution- NonComm…
Commons:Requests for comment/MP4 Video - Wikimedia Commons Jump to content From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository < Commons:Requests for comment Translate this page This discussion is now closed and archived. Please do not modify it. Closing with consensus prefer no MP…
Commons:Requests for comment/MP4 Video - Wikimedia Commons Jump to content From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository < Commons:Requests for comment Translate this page This discussion is now closed and archived. Please do not modify it. Closing with consensus prefer no MP…
Page 1
Next →