Wikibooks:Dealing with vandalism - Wikibooks, open books for an open world

Wikibooks:Dealing with vandalism - Wikibooks, open books for an open world
Jump to content
From Wikibooks, open books for an open world
This page documents an official
Wikibooks guideline
that the Wikibooks community has accepted and Wikibookians
should follow
. Except for minor edits, please make use of the
discussion page
to propose changes to this guideline.
For beginning vandal fighters
edit
edit source
Here's how it works
First, you spot some
vandalism
, for example, someone replacing the entire page with profanity, or adding a page with useless or offensive content. So you revert the page to the last good version, or you mark the page as a
candidate for speedy deletion
. Congratulations, you have just successfully dealt with vandalism!
How to revert
edit
edit source
Main page:
Help:Editing § Reverting
How to get a page deleted
edit
edit source
Pages which are solely vandalism (and don't have a non-vandalism version to revert to) can be
speedily deleted
. Click the
edit
tab at the top of the page, and add
{{
delete
|vandalism page}}
at the top. Add "requesting speedy deletion" to the
edit summary
, and click save. Done! An administrator will come along and delete it shortly.
For experienced vandal fighters
edit
edit source
Revert their vandalism.
Give them a warning on their talk page unless the vandalism is from an IP and over a few hours old.
If there's a warning already there, check when it was placed. It's only relevant if it's recent (maybe 1 or 2 weeks).
If they have a
{{
blocked
}}
template or a recent warning (and have vandalized since that warning), grab an admin at this point, since they're a persistent vandal in need of a block.
Otherwise, go to their
contributions
and look for other bad edits that haven't been reverted yet, and revert those.
Check if they've stopped since the warning. If they have, great. If not,
notify an admin
Finding vandalism
edit
edit source
If you're a dedicated vandal patroller, you can search for
vandalism
in four ways:
Put many pages on your watchlist and review them periodically for vandalism. This is especially useful if you watchlist pages which are regular targets of vandalism.
Comb through
Special:Recentchanges
for vandalism. Often, anonymous users are the worst vandals; you can hide logged-in users to narrow down your search.
New users'
contribs often contain edit tests, mistakes, and the like, which is not strictly vandalism but still needs to be dealt with.
Don't bite the newbies!
Join our counter-vandalism channel
#cvn-wb-en
, where a bot filters all edits to Wikibooks, presenting you with only suspicious edits.
Go through the
abuse filter log
, and find edits that were saved.
Tools for vandalism patrol
edit
edit source
Rollback
edit
edit source
Main page:
Help:Editing § Rollback
Users who are vandal fighters can now gain access to the MediaWiki
rollback
function, previously reserved for
administrators
only. To do so, make your request in the appropriate section of
WB:RFP
. The tool is likely to be given to active vandal fighters.
Rollback allows
administrators
and users with the
reviewer permission
to quickly revert vandalism. The rollback tool will revert all edits by the same user, starting from the top revision.
User Scripts
edit
edit source
There are also several scripts which make vandal patrol easier. These are available on the
Gadgets
tab of
Special:Preferences
Revert using
Twinkle
This allows all users to revert using the Twinkle script. This script does not work in Internet Explorer. (
Configuration
goes in your
skin
User Welcome Script
A script to semi-automagically
{{
welcome
}}
new users with no talk page, leave
{{
joinus
}}
for anons with no talk page, or warn any user with
{{
test
}}
Modify rollback
After using rollback, this script automatically forwards you to the user's contributions page to look for other edits to revert. Be careful, since this means you won't see if there's an error message after clicking rollback.
Reporting vandalism in progress
edit
edit source
In cases of repeated or particularly malicious vandalism, take note of that person's IP address or username and report them to the
administrators
. Start a new section at
Administrative Assistance
, adding the person's IP address or username and a few
examples
of vandalistic edits; sign it with four
tildes
(~~~~) to give the date and time, and hit save.
In cases of vandalism
in progress
, you may also want to report in
#wikibooks
. Don't wait to see if anyone's around; don't ask if you can report some vandalism -
just tell us
. If nobody seems to notice, say
!admin@enbooks
and try again. Please note that in emergency situations, we may already be dealing with the situation, and are simply too busy repairing the damage to respond.
If no response is evident after a few attempts to get attention over the course of several minutes and there is massive, ongoing vandalism, you should report this to the stewards in
#wikimedia-stewards
by saying !steward in that channel. Stewards are permitted to take emergency action to stop vandals on any wiki.
Blocking vandals
edit
edit source
Administrators
have the ability, and the authorization, to block the IPs of
persistent
vandals. These blocks should be the shortest effective length.
If an ex-vandal evades an IP block by obtaining a new IP, and starts making genuine (non-vandalism) contributions to Wikibooks, then they will not be blocked or reverted simply because they used to be a vandal. We do not block vandals to punish them, but rather to preserve the integrity of Wikibooks. If an ex-vandal has reformed, then our aims are accomplished.
Types of vandalism
edit
edit source
Blanking
Removing all or significant parts of pages (sometimes replacing the removed content with profanities) is a common vandal edit. However, significant content removals are usually
not
considered to be vandalism where the reason for the removal of the content is readily apparent by examination of the content itself, or where a non-frivolous explanation for the removal of apparently legitimate content is provided, linked to, or referenced in an edit summary. Due to the possibility of unexplained good-faith content removal, be cautious about treating anyone doing this like a vandal.
Childish vandalism
Some vandals spread the textual equivalent of graffiti over pages. They're extremely easy to detect, and are generally reverted in less than a minute.
Sneaky vandalism
Some vandals think they can outsmart contributors and add misinformation, change dates, or make other sensible-appearing substitutions and typos without anyone noticing, hiding vandalism, e.g., by making two bad edits and only reverting one, or reverting legitimate edits to hinder the improvement process. Can often be detected by looking at other edits by the same user, but be careful to avoid confusing sneaky vandalism with genuine corrections to a page.
Attention-seeking vandalism
(a type of
internet troll
). The opposite of
sneaky vandalism
, they want attention, and will do anything to get it, they will write insults, use offensive usernames, replace pages with jokes etc. just to make
you
message them, and when you do that, they will find that an excuse to replace your user page with a story about your mother. So when you recognize this type of attack, try not to feed the troll by flaming him or her - just deal with it calmly and unemotionally - or leave it for someone else if it's making you too angry.
Spam
Adding external links to a module or user page for promotional purposes is disruptive, and is considered to be spam. Although the specific links may be allowed under some circumstances, repeatedly adding links will in most cases result in all of them being removed. It is the behaviour in placing the links rather than the content of the site that may cause concerns.
Wikibooks is generally designed to not require excessive links to third-party websites, as the content is intended to be a permanent textbook reference. While some links may be necessary (such as where to obtain software required for the book), most of the links in question are not likely to add to a completed textbook. An alternative site for external links would be the
Open Directory Project
, which serves as a directory of links to various websites.
Link vandalism
Rewriting links within a page so that they appear the same, but point to something completely different or ridiculous (e.g.,
France
). Redirecting pages to nonsense titles is also vandalism.
Vandalbot (or spambot)
A script or "robot" which creates nonsensical pages (like
Wikibooks talk:Staff lounge/w/index.php/
), adds external links, replaces page content, moves pages, or creates malicious usernames. Such attacks are rare, but administrator or
CheckUser
intervention is often required to stem the tide.
Page move vandalism
Moving pages to offensive or nonsensical names. For example,
Willy on Wheels
and his many imitators will move a page to PAGENAME on Wheels ("Cookbook" becomes "Cookbook on Wheels"). Generally such attacks are severe; get help from administrators ASAP.
Copyright vandalism
Knowingly using copyrighted material on Wikibooks in ways which violate
Wikibooks's copyright policies
is vandalism. Because users may be unaware that the information is copyrighted, or of Wikibooks policies on how such material may and may not be used, such action
only
becomes vandalism if it continues after the copyrighted nature of the material and relevant policy restricting its use have been communicated to the user. Repeatedly uploading images with no source and/or license information after notification that such information is required may also constitute vandalism.
Bad-faith vandalism
Bad-faith placing or removing of
deletion
and
maintenance
and other related tags on pages that do not meet such criteria, have not been settled or in order to conceal or avert deletion. Such templates are an important way for people to show that there are problems with a page. Do not remove them from a page unless you are sure that all stated reasons for the dispute are settled. As a general rule, do not remove other people's tags twice during a 24-hour period. Do not place tags improperly, as in when there is no dispute, and the reason for placing the tag is because a suggested edit has failed to meet consensus. Instead, follow the
decision-making process
and accept that some edits will not meet consensus. Please note that placing or removal of dispute tags does
not
count as simple vandalism and is often mistakenly done by new users who are unfamiliar with Wikibooks, and such users should be given the benefit of the doubt and pointed to the proper page to discuss the issue.
Talk page vandalism
Deleting or altering the comments of other users from Talk pages other than your own comments is generally considered vandalism, unless it is your user talk pages, you are removing personal attacks or are archiving an overly long talk page to a separate page and then removing the text from the main Talk page, which is often considered legitimate. Adding comments to the talk page as if signed or written by someone else is also generally considered vandalism, however adding the proper signature to a comment that someone may have forgotten to include is not vandalism.
Policy vandalism
Deleting or altering part of a Wikibooks policy or guideline with which the vandal disagrees, without any attempt to seek consensus or recognize an existing consensus. However, improving or clarifying policy wording in line with the clear existing consensus is not vandalism.
Hidden vandalism
Any of the above in the form of hidden text not visible to the final rendering of the page but visible during editing.
Vandalism should not be confused with
edit
edit source
Vandalism is vandalism: these things are not, though they are sometimes called vandalism. They are therefore treated differently:
Newbie test
New users that discover the "Edit this page" button sometimes
really
want to know if they can edit any page, so they write something inside just to test it. This is not vandalism! On the contrary, these users should be warmly
greeted
, and given a reference to the
Wikibooks:Sandbox
where they can keep making their tests (oftentimes they will even revert their own changes).
Extended newbie test
Some users (especially the young ones) want to check out if they can make a module look
really
stupid, or radically change it to become unreadable. They simply want to test the limits of the wiki, some of them will stop (at some point) when you revert their changes, and will feel embarrassed when you write them a message.
Learning Wiki Markup
Some users require some time to learn the wiki-based markup, and will spend a little time experimenting with the different ways to make external links, internal links, and other special characters. Rather than condemning them as vandals, perhaps point them towards
Help
or
Wikibooks:Sandbox
NPOV violations
The
neutral point of view
is a difficult policy for many of us to understand, and even Wikibooks veterans occasionally accidentally introduce material which is non-ideal from an NPOV perspective. See
NPOV dispute
. Try to improve upon the edit rather than simply reverting it out-of-hand.
Bold edits
Wikibookians often make sweeping changes to modules in order to improve them—most of us aim to
be bold
when updating modules. While having large chunks of text you wrote removed, moved to talk, or substantially rewritten can sometimes feel like vandalism, it is the wiki way.
Mistakes
Sometimes, users will insert content into a module that is not necessarily accurate, in the belief that it is. By doing so in good faith, they are trying to contribute to Wikibooks and improve it. If you believe that there is
inaccurate information
in a module, ensure that it is, and/or discuss it with the user who has submitted it.
Unintentional Nonsense
While nonsense can be a form of vandalism, sometimes honest editors may not have expressed themselves correctly (there may be an error in the grammar, particularly for Wikibookians who use English as a second language, or mistakes using wiki markup). This is a type of mistake. Sometimes connection errors unintentionally produce the appearance of nonsense. In either case,
assume good faith
and help the user along.
New Patrollers
While page blanking can be a form of vandalism, sometimes new users may try to revert vandalism by blanking the page or taking other steps which may seem questionable. Instead of labelling a potential patroller a vandal, try to fix his or her mistake and point the person to this page, so they may learn how to better combat vandalism.
Templates
edit
edit source
Main page:
Wikibooks:Templates/User notices
Category:User warning templates
What to type
What it makes
{{subst:
test
|~~~~|
Page (optional)
}}
Please, can you
help
improve
Wikibooks
by
doing future experiments
with the
wiki software
in the
sandbox
instead? Your fellow contributors consider test edits in the sandbox constructive. You can ask questions or ask for help in the
Assistance Reading Room
Thanks.
{{subst:
bv
|~~~~}}
You may be
blocked
without further warning if you continue to make
unconstructive edits
You have been warned previously that your edits are disruptive and despite your warnings, have continued making unconstructive edits. Please stop, and consider
improving
rather than damaging the hard work of others.
Thanks.
{{subst:
blocked
|1 week|sig=~~~~}}
You cannot edit
for 1 week due to disruptive editing
. You are welcome to contribute constructively when editing privileges are restored. You may appeal this action with a reasonable argument by adding the text
{{
unblock
|Your reason here}}
below.
See also
edit
edit source
Help:Editing#Rollback
Using Wikibooks/Vandalism
Wikibooks editor navigation
Content
Stacks
Departments
Adding books
Alphabetical classification
Featured books
Criteria
Cookbook
Wikijunior
Department
Computing
Engineering
Humanities
Languages
Mathematics
Science
Social sciences
Standard curricula
Wikibooks and MediaWiki help
PDF versions
Requested books
FAQs
Wikibooks overview
Readers
Contributing
Editing
Administration
Problems
Help
Glossary
Navigating
Pages (Creating, Namespaces, Discussing, Archiving, Moving, Merging, Deleting)
Tracking changes
Account management
Contributing (Why and why not contribute? Starting a book)
Editing
Categories
Files
Tables
Variables
Formulas
Quizzes
Local manuals of style
Wikijunior
Collections
Importing
Editnotices
Database download
Development stages
Dialog
Assistant
Export
Print versions
Help books (
Using Wikibooks
Editing Wikitext
CSS
Templates
Template help
Template index
Book information
General
Sources
Links
Files
Media
Maintenance
Licensing issues notices
Deletion
Stubs
User messages
User notices
User pages
Discussion
Featured books
Policies and guidelines
Template categories
Making Templates A101
Templates Ready to Use
Reading room
General
Proposals
Projects
Featured books
General
Technical
Administrative
Deletion
Undeletion
Import
Permissions
Bulletin Board
Information pages
Accuracy dispute
Authorship
Autoblock
Book donations
Categories
Dealing with vandalism
Dewikify
How to obtain public domain books
Language Learning Difficulty
Licensing guidelines
NPOV dispute
Reading Levels
Render as PNG
Subject pages
Textbook standards
User groups
Wikibooks for course instructors
Wikibooks for Wikimedians
Wikimedia
Other
project pages
Welcome
Sandbox
Disclaimers category
CCO Resources
Shortcuts
Community Portal
Maintenance
WikiProject
Wikibooks essays
Essays category
Book sources
Wikibooks for teaching
Guidelines for class projects
List of class projects
WikiNode
Edit filter
CC-BY-SA License
GFDL License
See also:
Policies and guidelines
Category
Retrieved from "
Category
Wikibooks guidelines
Wikibooks
Dealing with vandalism
Add topic