ここは「良質な画像」を選定するための候補画像を集めたページです。 「秀逸な画像」とは異なるものであることに留意してください。 さらに、あなたの投稿した写真について何か意見（フィードバック）がほしければ、コモンズ:写真の批評で見ることができます。

目的

「良質な画像」の目的は、Wikimedia Commonsの活動の基盤となっている人々、すなわちコレクションの拡大につながる独特の画像を提供している個々の利用者を応援することです。 「秀逸な画像」がコモンズにアップロードされた作品の最高峰を示すのに対し、「良質な画像」は良質な写真をコモンズに登録するよう、利用者に呼びかけることを目指します。 加えて良質な画像のページは、他の利用者に画像の質を上げる例を示す場所としても使われるべきです。

ガイドライン

良質な画像への推薦はコモンズユーザー自身が作成したものに限ります。

画像を推薦する方へ

以下の説明は、良質な画像への全般的なガイドラインです。より詳しい評価基準は画像のガイドラインを参照して下さい。

推薦画像に求められるもの

  1. 著作権の状況。良質な画像の候補作は適合するライセンスを添えてコモンズに投稿しなければなりません。ライセンスの要件全文はCommons:コピーライト・タグをご参照ください。
  2. 画像はすべてCommonsの方針と慣例に従うものとし、Commons:識別可能な人物の写真も対象です。
  3. 良質な画像には意味のあるファイル名をつけ、適切なカテゴリに分類し、ファイルページに1つ以上の言語で的確な説明を書くものとします。必須条件ではありませんが、英語による説明も添えてください。
  4. 広告や署名が画像でありません 品質画像の著作権と著作権情報は画像ページに掲載され、画像メタデータに含まれても、画像内容に干渉してはならない。

作者

AI生成メディアをQIの対象から正確に除外するための文言変更案 see discussion

良質な画像の審査対象になるには、画像がウィキメディアンによって作成されたものである必要があります。したがって、たとえば Flickr からインポートした画像は良質な画像には立候補いただけません。（秀逸な画像にはこの制限はありません。） 二次元の美術品を再現した写真作品はウィキメディアンが作家の場合は対象です（そしてコモンズのガイドラインに従い、PD-oldでライセンスされるべきです）。 もし作者がウィキメディアンではないのに画像が選出された場合は、間違いが発見された時点で速やかに良質な画像の資格を外す必要があります。

技術要件

さらに詳細な評価基準はイメージガイドラインを参照して下さい。

決議

ビットマップ画像 (JPEG、PNG、GIF、TIFF) は通常、サイズが2メガピクセル以上必要です。場合によっては、審査する方はもっと大きなサイズを要求する場合があります。 理由として、コモンズに登録された画像は印刷されることや解像度の非常に高いモニターに映し出すこと、あるいは将来的に開発されるメディアで使用される可能性があるためです。なお、この規則はベクター画像 (SVG) やコンピュータで合成した画像でフリーライセンスの適用対象もしくはオープンソフトウェアプログラムを利用し、なおかつ画像の説明に明記したものは対象外。

画像の品質

デジタル画像は取り込みや処理において様々な問題が生じている可能性があります。予防可能なノイズ、JPEG圧縮の際の問題、シャドウ、ハイライト部分の情報不足、色の取り込みにおける問題、これらの問題はすべて正しく処理されている必要があります。

構図や照明

画像内の主題の配置は画像に役立つ位置に置くべきです。前景と背景の物がじゃまになっていてはいけません。照明とピントも相対的な評価に直結します。主題はピントがシャープで、ごちゃごちゃせず露光が十分である必要があります。

価値観点

我々の目標は、コモンズを通して行われる、ウィキメディアの他のプロジェクト群において有用となる良質な画像の投稿を、奨励することにあります。

推薦方法

Commons:Quality images candidates/candidate list の候補画像リストの節に以下の行を追記するだけで推薦することが可能です。 

File:画像名.jpg|{{/Nomination|簡潔に画像の説明を記入  --~~~~ |}}

画像の説明は簡単で構いません。また、ひとつ前の候補画像との間には何もない行を一行残しておいてください。

自分以外のウィキメディアンの画像を推薦する場合、作者の利用者名を以下の例のように説明文内に示してください 

File:画像名.jpg|{{/Nomination|数語の画像説明 (投票者[[User:利用者名|利用者名]]) --~~~~ |}}

ご注意：推薦の手順を簡略化するガジェットとして QInominator があります。 ファイルページの上部に「この画像を良質な画像に推薦する」というリンクが小さく表示されます。このリンクを押すと、画像は候補一覧に追加されます。この一覧が済んだらCommons:Quality images candidates/candidate listを編集します。編集ウィンドウの上部に表示される緑色の棒をクリックすると、条件を満たす候補作がすべて、編集窓に加わります。

推薦数

一度に選べる枚数はひとり当たり1日5点以内です。

「注意: 可能であれば、推薦する写真ごとに、他の候補の写真を少なくとも 1 つ確認してください。」

画像評価

評価するには登録ユーザーで、なおかつ登録後10日以上経過し、編集回数50回以上であること、作者でも推薦者でもないことを満たすと資格があります。QICvoteガジェットを有効化すると、より簡単に評価することができます。

評価者は推薦者と同様に画像のガイドラインを基準に画像の評価をしてください。

評価方法

状態の更新方法

画像の評価は慎重に行って下さい。画像は等倍サイズで開き、品質基準を満たしているかどうかを確認して下さい。

  • その画像が品質を満たしていると判断したら、下記のように該当箇所を書き換えます。
File:画像名.jpg|{{/Nomination| 数語の画像説明 --~~~~ |}}

から以下に書き換えます。

File:画像名.jpg|{{/Promotion| 画像説明 --推薦者署名 | 評価理由 --~~~~ }}

つまりテンプレートを /Nomination から /Promotion へ切り替え、署名をし、可能ならコメントを記入するのみです。

  • 画像が基準を満たしていないと判断した場合は、下記の様に書き換えます。
File:画像名.jpg|{{/Nomination| 数語の画像説明 --~~~~ |}}

から以下に書き換えます。

File:画像名.jpg|{{/Decline| 画像説明 --推薦者署名 | 評価理由 --~~~~ }}

言い換えると、テンプレートを/Nomination から /Decline に変更して利用者の著名を付与、落選した画像の分類を示す文を付け加えることもできます (ガイドラインから節の題名を利用)。 もし問題が多い場合は最も深刻な順に2点もしくは3点に絞り込むか、複数の問題あり と提示してください。推薦作を落選とする場合は、理由を推薦者のトークページに記入します – 規則として丁寧な文面で読んだ人を勇気づけることです。そのメッセージには決定の詳細を説明します。

注意：推薦日の古い順に審査し、可能な限り自分が推薦した点数と少なくとも同数の作品を評価してください。

Good voting practices

  1. Do not have an image moved to consensual review ("Discuss") unless someone else added a vote with which you disagree.
  2. If you think the image meets QI criteria, use "Promotion" right away.
  3. If you think the image does not meet QI criteria and the issues cannot be solved, use "Decline" right away.
  4. If instead you believe that the issues can be solved, leave a comment without changing the status (keep it as Nomination).
  5. Do not add new votes under already promoted or declined images if you agree with the decision. The bot checks the date of the last comment, so this only delays the result.
  6. If a comment raises an unresolved issue, promoting is generally considered impolite. Only promote if the issue is clearly minor, fixed, or incorrect - and say so briefly. If you’re not sure, add a comment (don't change status). Change to "Discuss" only once conflicting votes appear.

評価猶予期間から決定まで

最初の票が入ってから2日（48時間）以内に反対投票がない場合、当該の画像は評価に従い候補もしくは候補外となります。反対意見がある場合は状態を Discuss に変更すると、当該の画像は 同意審査 Consensual review 節へ移動されます。

結論の出し方

上記の猶予期間2日が過ぎると、QICbotは自動的に投票結果が出たものとして処理し、候補作に推薦された画像はCommons:Quality Images/Recently promotedにキャッシュされます。カテゴリ付与が済むと自動的に適切な良質な画像ページに追加されます。

もし皆さんが、秀逸な画像の地位に匹敵する特別な画像を発見したと思われた場合は、ぜひこの機会に当該画像をCommons:Featured picture candidatesに推薦してみてはいかがでしょうか。

  • 審査を待機中の画像は枠線がブルーの枠線内に推薦文を表示
  • 審査者が当選と認めた画像は枠線が緑色
  • 審査者が落選と決めた画像は枠線が赤色

評価を受けなかった画像（青枠のまま）

推薦されこのページに掲出された画像は8日以内に、当落どちらの票も集まらなかった場合、あるいは合意に至らなかった（つまり同意審査で賛成票と反対票が同数だった）場合、当該の画像は推薦なしとしてCommons:Quality images candidates/Archives April 26 2026にアーカイブしてこのページからは削除し、画像の説明ページのカテゴリ欄にCategory:Unassessed QI candidatesを追加します。

同意審査のプロセス

同意審査とはよく目にする呼び方で、上記の手順で合意が得られず、他の意見を求める必要がある事例に使われます。

同意審査の申請をするには

手続きは状態を/Promotion, /Decline から /Discuss に変えるだけで、審査の直後にご自分のコメントを記入してください。ボットの自動処理により、当該画像は1日以内に同意審査節へ移動されます。

同意審査へ申し送りする対象は、すでに当選・落選の審査が済んだ画像のみとします。審査者として、もしもご自分で判断がつかない場合には当該画像をこのページに置いたまま、コメントを添えます。

同意審査のルール

Commons:良質な画像の候補#ルールを参照なさってください

ページの再読み込み： purge this page's cache

Nominations

Due to the Mediawiki parser code ~~~~ signatures will only work on this page if you have JavaScript enabled. If you do not have JavaScript enabled please manually sign with: 

--[[User:yourname|yourname]] 02:48, 26 4月 2026 (UTC)
  • Please open a new date section if you are nominating an image after 0:00 o'clock (UTC)
  • Please insert a blank line between your new entry and any existing entries
  • Please help in reviewing "old" nominations here below first; many are still unassessed
  • If you see terms with which you are unfamiliar, please see explanations at Photography terms

If you are not ready to Promote or Decline an image, you may leave a Comment instead.

If someone else has already promoted or declined an image and you disagree, you may cast an opposite voice or use Discuss — this will move the image to the Community Review section.

If you agree with a previous decision, there is no need to cast the same vote again, as doing so only delays the final closure of the nomination.


April 26, 2026

    • Nomination: Perth County Courthouse, Stratford, Ontario, 2025-08-04; terracotta relief by Henry Plasschaert depicting fingers pointing upward --Crisco 1492 02:41, 26 April 2026 (UTC)
    • Review needed

    • Nomination: Perth County Courthouse, Stratford, Ontario, 2025-08-04; terracotta relief by Henry Plasschaert depicting tools of art --Crisco 1492 02:41, 26 April 2026 (UTC)
    • Review needed

    • Nomination: Our Lady of Sorrows Church in Nowa Ruda 1 --Jacek Halicki 02:40, 26 April 2026 (UTC)
    • Review needed

    • Nomination: Our Lady of Sorrows Church in Nowa Ruda 2 --Jacek Halicki 02:40, 26 April 2026 (UTC)
    • Review needed

    • Nomination: Saint Catherine of Alexandria church in Nowa Ruda 1 --Jacek Halicki 02:40, 26 April 2026 (UTC)
    • Review needed

    • Nomination: Saint Catherine of Alexandria church in Nowa Ruda 2 --Jacek Halicki 02:40, 26 April 2026 (UTC)
    • Review needed

    • Nomination: Saint Catherine of Alexandria church in Nowa Ruda 3 --Jacek Halicki 02:40, 26 April 2026 (UTC)
    • Review needed

    • Nomination: Saint John the Baptist church in Bad Saulgau, Baden-Württemberg, Germany. --Tournasol7 01:09, 26 April 2026 (UTC)
    • Review needed

    • Nomination: On a wall in Belvís Park, Santiago de Compostela: Erigeron karvinskianus or Bellis perennis, Polypodium spec., Hedera helix. --Lmbuga 00:39, 26 April 2026 (UTC)
    • Review needed

    • Nomination: Path in the Belvís Park, Santiago de Compostela, Galicia. --Lmbuga 00:39, 26 April 2026 (UTC)
    • Review needed

    • Nomination: An architectural detail of the Palm House of the Flower Gardens Hirschstetten. --Aciarium 00:01, 26 April 2026 (UTC)
    • Review needed

April 25, 2026

    • Nomination: A protected Husar vehicle of the PsyOps unit of the Austrian Bundesheer. A remote weapon system and a high-performance speaker are mounted on its roof. --Aciarium 23:54, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
    • Review needed

    • Nomination: The interior of an empty greenhouse of the Flower Gardens Hirschstetten. --Aciarium 23:54, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
    • Review needed

    • Nomination: A Mercedes-Benz Sprinter of the department "Parks and Gardens" of the City of Vienna at the Flower Gardens Hirschstetten. --Aciarium 23:54, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
    • Review needed

    • Nomination: Moscow - 2025 - The President-Hotel --Юрий Д.К. 22:16, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
    • Review needed

    • Nomination: Moscow - 2025 - Kadashevskaya embankment, 6 --Юрий Д.К. 22:16, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
    • Review needed

    • Nomination Victoria Falls rain forrest, Zimbabwe. Snapped using Facebook messenger app.--FaysaLBinDaruL 21:15, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
    • Decline
       Oppose Nice image, but too small, sorry. --Екатерина Борисова 00:29, 26 April 2026 (UTC)
    • Nomination: Zwiefalter Straße 2 in Riedlingen, Baden-Württemberg, Germany. --Tournasol7 21:13, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
    • Review needed

    • Nomination: Zwiefalter Tor in Riedlingen, Baden-Württemberg, Germany. --Tournasol7 21:13, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
    • Review needed

    • Nomination: Paradiesstraße 5 in Riedlingen, Baden-Württemberg, Germany. --Tournasol7 21:13, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
    • Review needed

    • Nomination: Altes Schloss in Gießen, Hesse, Germany. --Tournasol7 21:13, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
    • Review needed

    • Nomination: Exterior of Schloss Mannheim, Baden-Württemberg, Germany. --Tournasol7 21:13, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
    • Review needed

    • Nomination: Flood on the Tsna river, Russia --Alexander Novikov 21:03, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
    • Review needed

    • Nomination: Tanandon river in the Alaniya National Park --Alexander Novikov 21:03, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
    • Review needed

    • Nomination: Akhlebinovskaya Grove in Tambov --Alexander Novikov 21:03, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
    • Review needed

    • Nomination: Dreischeibenhaus, Düsseldorfer Schauspielhaus (theatre building) and a façade planted with hornbeam hedges at the Kö-Bogen II (a complex in Düsseldorf downtown --Tuxyso 21:00, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
    • Review
       Support Good quality. --FaysaLBinDaruL 21:15, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
    • Nomination: The Kolbenberg in the Taunus seen from the Weiße Mauer, Hesse, Germany--Milseburg 20:52, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
    • Review needed

    • Nomination: Eurasian blue tit (Cyanistes caeruleus) --Romzig 20:41, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
    • Review needed

    • Nomination: white wagtail (Motacilla alba) --Romzig 20:41, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
    • Review needed

    • Nomination: Siebenbrüderhöhle in the Kröllwitz district in Halle (Saale) --Romzig 20:41, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
    • Review needed

    • Nomination: A façade planted with hornbeam hedges at the Kö-Bogen II (a complex in Düsseldorf downtown – with 30,000 plants, Europe’s largest green façade. --Tuxyso 20:41, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
    • Review
       Support Good quality. --FaysaLBinDaruL 21:15, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
    • Nomination: Chestnut munia (Lonchura atricapilla jagori) juvenile --Charlesjsharp 20:24, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
    • Review needed

    • Nomination: Great terns (Thalasseus bergii cristatus) --Charlesjsharp 20:24, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
    • Review needed

    • Nomination: Micronesian megapode (Megapodius laperouse senex) --Charlesjsharp 20:24, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
    • Review needed

    • Nomination: Nankeen night heron (Nycticorax caledonicus pelewensis) --Charlesjsharp 20:24, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
    • Review needed

    • Nomination: Ticket office of Adler-Schiffe in Świnoujście --MB-one 20:18, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
    • Review needed

    • Nomination: Case IH Farmall 75C Electric at Agritechnica 2023 --MB-one 20:18, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
    • Review needed

    • Nomination: Cervélo bicycle at Cyclingworld Europe 2024 in Meerbusch --MB-one 20:18, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
    • Review needed

    • Nomination: Rear view of the listed building Obere Sandstraße 13 in Bamberg --MB-one 20:18, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
    • Review needed

    • Nomination: Ministry of Finance of the State of North Rhine-Westphalia in Düsseldorf at street Jägerhofstraße 6 --Tuxyso 19:21, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
    • Review needed

    • Nomination: Monumental brass of Henry Gibbes in St James' Priory, Bristol --Plasmium 18:06, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
    • Review needed

    • Nomination: Our Lady of Sorrows Church in Nowa Ruda 4 by User:Jacek Halicki--Boston9 17:21, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
    • Review needed

    • Nomination: Our Lady of Sorrows Church in Nowa Ruda 5 by User:Jacek Halicki--Boston9 17:21, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
    • Review needed

    • Nomination: Our Lady of Sorrows Church in Nowa Ruda 5 by User:Jacek Halicki--Poconaco 15:09, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
    • Review
      verticals lean slighlty to right --E bailey 17:42, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
    • Nomination Fenerbahçe ParkI, the copyright holder of this work, hereby publish it under the following license: --Kadı 11:15, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
    • Decline Insufficient sharpness --Poconaco 15:12, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
    • Nomination Fenerbahçe ParkI, the copyright holder of this work, hereby publish it under the following license: --Kadı 11:15, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
    • Decline Insufficient sharpness --Poconaco 15:12, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
    • Nomination Horses in a steppe east from Sarybulak. Qonaev city district, Almaty Region, Kazakhstan. --Красный 10:11, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
    • Decline Unsharp --Poconaco 15:15, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
    • Nomination Horses in a steppe east from Sarybulak. Qonaev city district, Almaty Region, Kazakhstan. --Красный 10:11, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
    • Decline Unsharp --Poconaco 15:15, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
    • Nomination: Incirli Metrobus station, Bakırköy, Istanbul, --ArildV 09:17, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
    • Review needed

    • Nomination: Karla Marksa str 7 house, Brest. --Mike1979 Russia 08:44, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
    • Review needed

    • Nomination: Saint-Jean-de-Maurienne (Savoie, France) - Saint John the Baptist cathedral - Stained-glass window of the Baptism of Jesus Christ --Benjism89 08:34, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
    • Review needed

    • Nomination: Crested Lark (Galerida cristata) in Tal Chhapar Sanctuary, Rajasthan, India. --Tisha Mukherjee 08:32, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
    • Review
      Why only 3.3MP resolution? --E bailey 17:30, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
    • Nomination: Crested Lark (Galerida cristata) in Tal Chhapar Sanctuary, Rajasthan, India. --Tisha Mukherjee 08:32, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
    • Review needed

    • Nomination: Demoiselle Crane (Grus virgo) in Tal Chhapar Sanctuary, Rajasthan, India. --Tisha Mukherjee 08:32, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
    • Review needed

    • Nomination: Rúa das Trompas, Santiago de Compostela, Galicia (Spain). --Lmbuga 07:40, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
    • Review needed

    • Nomination: Theodor-Stern-Kai 1 in Frankfurt am Main. Main tenant is the Allianz SE. --NorbertNagel 07:23, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
    • Review needed

    • Nomination: European Central Bank in Frankfurt during construction in 2012. --NorbertNagel 07:23, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
    • Review needed

    • Nomination: Tree in a flowerpot, French Garden, Celle (Fisheye perspective). --NorbertNagel 07:23, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
    • Review needed

    • Nomination: Single Early tulipa cultivar 'Flair' in the botanical garden in Munich, Germany --Kritzolina 05:31, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
    • Review needed

    • Nomination: Single early tulipa cultivar 'White Marvel' in the botanical garden in Munich, Germany --Kritzolina 05:31, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
    • Review needed

    • Nomination: Lily-flowered tulipa cultivar 'Holland Chic' in the botanical garden in Munich, Germany --Kritzolina 05:31, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
    • Review needed

    • Nomination: Tourist shelter on St. Anne's Mountain 2 --Jacek Halicki 05:13, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
    • Review needed

    • Nomination Tenement house, 26 Starowiślna street, Kraków, Poland --Igor123121 04:51, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
    • Discussion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 05:15, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
       Oppose Temporarily oppose because of red category that should be fixed. --Екатерина Борисова 00:45, 26 April 2026 (UTC)
    • Nomination Big inflatable black cat --Oleg Yunakov 02:14, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
    • Decline
       Oppose Cute cat figure, but bad perspective, dull light and heavy CA's makes it not QI, sorry. --Екатерина Борисова 00:50, 26 April 2026 (UTC)
    • Nomination White duck --Oleg Yunakov 02:14, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
    • Decline
       Oppose very sorry, but lack of detail on the subject. --Pdanese 03:32, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
    • Nomination: Great Egret --Oleg Yunakov 02:14, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
    • Review needed

    • Nomination: Messiah is here --Oleg Yunakov 02:14, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
    • Review needed

    • Nomination: Downtown Manhattan Skyline --Oleg Yunakov 02:14, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
    • Review needed

    • Nomination: Mountain laurel in the late-day sun --PeterCooperJr 01:57, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
    • Review needed

    • Nomination: Walking from the market in a storm in Quebec city, Quebec, Canada --Wilfredor 01:48, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
    • Review
      I like the composition and subject, but it feels tilted? Lamp posts and horizon make it feel like it's leaning. --E bailey 17:20, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
    • Nomination Emperor Commodus as Hercules in Capitoline Museum, Rome, Italy --Wilfredor 01:48, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
    • Decline
       Oppose Sorry, but too low DoF, only the top part if sharp. --Plozessor 03:53, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
    • Nomination: Baptism in Philadelphia Church --Wilfredor 01:48, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
    • Review needed

    • Nomination: House in Sao Jose dos Pinhais, Parana --Wilfredor 01:48, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
    • Review
      Sao Jose dos Pinhais is a big city, thus we'e need either an address or coordinates. Just "House in Sao Jose dos Pinhais" is not specific enough. --Plozessor 03:53, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
      Added Geotag --Wilfredor 19:03, 25 April 2026 (UTC)

April 24, 2026

    • Nomination: Osbaldwick Village Hall, York --Plasmium 22:55, 24 April 2026 (UTC)
    • Review needed

    • Nomination: Brimstone butterfly (Gonepteryx rhamni) on a dandelion flower (Taraxacum sect. Ruderalia) --Romzig 20:36, 24 April 2026 (UTC)
    • Review needed

    • Nomination: Raspberry Pi AI HAT+ 2 box --Suyash.dwivedi 20:35, 24 April 2026 (UTC)
    • Review needed

    • Nomination: Manhole cover in Nürnberg --Lvova 19:01, 24 April 2026 (UTC)
    • Review needed

    • Nomination: Inchi, a Bangladeshi rice variety. --ROCKY 18:40, 24 April 2026 (UTC)
    • Review needed

    • Nomination: La Tour de Grandhan --JackyM59 18:16, 24 April 2026 (UTC)
    • Review needed

    • Nomination: Listed building at Neubaugasse 5 in the historic town centre of Altdorf bei Nürnberg --MB-one 16:33, 24 April 2026 (UTC)
    • Review needed

    • Nomination Sacred Heart Church, Málaga, Spain --Poco a poco 08:54, 24 April 2026 (UTC)
    • Decline
       Oppose Unsharp in the upper and lower parts, sorry --Uoaei1 10:21, 24 April 2026 (UTC)
    • Nomination: Observation tower on St. Anna’s Mountain in Nowa Ruda 2 by User:Jacek Halicki--Boston9 07:22, 24 April 2026 (UTC)
    • Review
      Looks tilted - leaning to the right --Uoaei1 10:23, 24 April 2026 (UTC)@Uoaei1: ✓ Done--Jacek Halicki 16:20, 24 April 2026 (UTC)
    • Nomination: Harbor railway bridge (Karl Meseberg Bridge) in Halle (Saale) with memorial plaque for Karl Meseberg. --Romzig 07:10, 24 April 2026 (UTC)
    • Review needed

    • Nomination: Knight's armor. Europe, 16th-17th centuries. Brest Regional Homeland Museum. --Mike1979 Russia 06:37, 24 April 2026 (UTC)
    • Review needed

    • Nomination: Idols. Granite. Late 10th - early 11th centuries. Discovered near the villages of Grabaitsy and Zaluzha in 1970. Brest Regional Homeland Museum. --Mike1979 Russia 06:37, 24 April 2026 (UTC)
    • Review needed

    • Nomination: Saint Anne church in Nowa Ruda 2 --Jacek Halicki 06:35, 24 April 2026 (UTC)
    • Review needed

    • Nomination: Saint Anne church in Nowa Ruda 3 --Jacek Halicki 06:35, 24 April 2026 (UTC)
    • Review needed

    • Nomination: Saint Anne church in Nowa Ruda 4 --Jacek Halicki 06:35, 24 April 2026 (UTC)
    • Review needed

    • Nomination: Swing ride at the Wurstmarkt Dürkheim
      --F. Riedelio 05:43, 24 April 2026 (UTC)
    • Review needed

    • Nomination: Amsterdam-NL, office building (Garant BBVA International) at the Keizersgracht --Michielverbeek 05:34, 24 April 2026 (UTC)
    • Review needed

    • Nomination: Triumph tulipa cultivar 'Cheers' in the botanical garden in Munich, Germany --Kritzolina 05:29, 24 April 2026 (UTC)
    • Review needed

    • Nomination: Triumph tulipa cultivar 'Havran' in the botanical garden in Munich, Germany --Kritzolina 05:29, 24 April 2026 (UTC)
    • Review needed

    • Nomination: Darwin Hybrid tulipa cultivar 'Ad Rem' in the botanical garden in Munich, Germany --Kritzolina 05:29, 24 April 2026 (UTC)
    • Review needed

    • Nomination: Single Early tulipa cultivar 'Cape Town' in the botanical garden in Munich, Germany --Kritzolina 05:29, 24 April 2026 (UTC)
    • Review needed

  • Please sign with name and date (four tildes)
    • Nomination: Nilgai (Boselaphus tragocamelus) in Bandhavgarh National Park, India --Bgag 03:06, 24 April 2026 (UTC)
    • Review needed

April 23, 2026

    • Nomination: BMW M3 at Auto Zürich 2024 --MB-one 21:03, 23 April 2026 (UTC)
    • Review needed

    • Nomination: Custom VW Beetle at Essen Motor Show 2023 --MB-one 21:03, 23 April 2026 (UTC)
    • Review needed

    • Nomination: Hotel Only You, Málaga, Spain --Poco a poco 20:55, 23 April 2026 (UTC)
    • Review
      Quality is good but the image is not fully uploaded (gray line on the bottom). Can you crop or re-upload it? --Юрий Д.К. 21:00, 23 April 2026 (UTC)
    • Nomination: Hotel Only You, Málaga, Spain --Poco a poco 20:55, 23 April 2026 (UTC)
    • Review  Comment PC is needed. --Sebring12Hrs 05:33, 24 April 2026 (UTC)
    • Nomination: A lion statue at the entrance to the Belvedere-Hof at the Belvederegasse 6-8 in Vienna, Austria--FlocciNivis 15:59, 23 April 2026 (UTC)
    • Review needed

    • Nomination: Applause for Wolfgang Ischinger, german Diplomat --Grunpfnul 15:47, 23 April 2026 (UTC)
    • Review needed

    • Nomination: Ludwigskirche in Saarbrücken, Germany. --NorbertNagel 15:46, 23 April 2026 (UTC)
    • Review
      There is CA in the branches that needs to be removed --FlocciNivis 16:57, 23 April 2026 (UTC)
      ✓ Done Thank you! CA removed. --NorbertNagel 15:48, 24 April 2026 (UTC)
    • Nomination: Interior of Ludwigskirche in Saarbrücken. --NorbertNagel 15:46, 23 April 2026 (UTC)
    • Review needed

    • Nomination: Organ of Ludwigskirche in Saarbrücken. --NorbertNagel 15:46, 23 April 2026 (UTC)
    • Review needed

    • Nomination: Wayside cross in Aachen, Germany --Grunpfnul 15:22, 23 April 2026 (UTC)
    • Review needed

    • Nomination: Ireland, Glengarriff, Church of the Sacred Heart --Berthold Werner 15:17, 23 April 2026 (UTC)
    • Review needed

    • Nomination: Wooden bridge in the Röders' Park am Halifax
      --F. Riedelio 14:33, 23 April 2026 (UTC)
    • Review needed

    • Nomination Wooden berth on Lake Starnberg
      --F. Riedelio 14:33, 23 April 2026 (UTC)
    • Decline
      Leans to the right --Grunpfnul 15:48, 23 April 2026 (UTC)
      Lack of sharpness in full resolution and substantial CA. --NorbertNagel 15:53, 23 April 2026 (UTC)
    • Nomination: Welcome to Wilbraham sign --PeterCooperJr 13:43, 23 April 2026 (UTC)
    • Review needed

    • Nomination: Looking across the pond/wetland at Bennett WMA --PeterCooperJr 13:43, 23 April 2026 (UTC)
    • Review needed

    • Nomination: Red maple tree twigs starting to bud --PeterCooperJr 13:43, 23 April 2026 (UTC)
    • Review needed

    • Nomination: Morse Pond --PeterCooperJr 13:43, 23 April 2026 (UTC)
    • Review needed

    • Nomination: Olbersdorfer See, Germany --Pudelek 12:45, 23 April 2026 (UTC)
    • Review needed

    • Nomination: Olbersdorfer See, Germany --Pudelek 12:45, 23 April 2026 (UTC)
    • Review needed

    • Nomination: Sunset in the Romanche Valley, France. --DimiTalen 09:32, 23 April 2026 (UTC)
    • Review needed

    • Nomination: Place Victor-Hugo, Grenoble. --DimiTalen 09:32, 23 April 2026 (UTC)
    • Review needed

    • Nomination: 8 Av. Alsace-Lorraine, Grenoble. --DimiTalen 09:32, 23 April 2026 (UTC)
    • Review needed

    • Nomination: Saint-Jean-de-Maurienne (Savoie, France) - The cathedral at night --Benjism89 06:01, 23 April 2026 (UTC)
    • Review needed

    • Nomination: Saint-Jean-de-Maurienne (Savoie, France) - The town hall at night --Benjism89 06:01, 23 April 2026 (UTC)
    • Review needed

    • Nomination: Amsterdam-NL, Keizersgracht 242 to 258 --Michielverbeek 05:40, 23 April 2026 (UTC)
    • Review needed

    • Nomination: Amsterdam, Keizersgracht 663 to 673 --Michielverbeek 05:40, 23 April 2026 (UTC)
    • Review
      The left building looks very strange. Its windows seem to be rectangular, but they have different shapes. --Екатерина Борисова 03:01, 24 April 2026 (UTC)
      I understand the image is distorted. I hope I have time to solve this problem manual coming Tuesday. Please realize that the old center of Amsterdam is subsiding seriously and ofcourse you can see this also reflected in most contemporary photos. --Michielverbeek 20:14, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
      I've been to Amsterdam and I love this city. And of course, I know that there's something wrong with the soils. It's just that in this case, as a photographer, you know better what's wrong with the windows of this house - are they crooked in nature or is it a flaw in the picture? If you say that they are naturally like that, I'll believe you :) --Екатерина Борисова 01:05, 26 April 2026 (UTC)
    • Nomination: Double early tulipa cultivar 'Disneyland Paris' in the botanical garden in Munich, Germany --Kritzolina 05:26, 23 April 2026 (UTC)
    • Review needed

    • Nomination: Double late tulipa cultivar 'Akebono' in the botanical garden in Munich, Germany --Kritzolina 05:26, 23 April 2026 (UTC)
    • Review needed

    • Nomination Triumph tulipa cultivar 'Grand Perfection' in the botanical garden in Munich, Germany --Kritzolina 05:26, 23 April 2026 (UTC)
    • Decline
       Oppose Beautiful, but not sharp. --Екатерина Борисова 02:57, 24 April 2026 (UTC)
    • Nomination: Miodowa street, view from E, Kazimierz, Kraków, Poland --Igor123121 03:50, 23 April 2026 (UTC)
    • Review needed

    • Nomination Gaur (Bos gaurus) walking, Valparai, Tamil Nadu, India --Tagooty 03:43, 23 April 2026 (UTC)
    • Decline
       Oppose Looks rather noisy to me, especially around the ear and horns but elsewhere too --PeterCooperJr 01:49, 26 April 2026 (UTC)
    • Nomination: Indian leopard (Panthera pardus fusca) in Kanha National Park, India --Bgag 03:38, 23 April 2026 (UTC)
    • Review needed

    • Nomination: Bell tower of the Saint George church in Riedlingen, Baden-Württemberg, Germany. --Tournasol7 02:56, 23 April 2026 (UTC)
    • Review needed

    • Nomination: A Volkswagen T6 of the Austrian Bundesheer, temporarily used as an escort vehicle. --Aciarium 00:00, 23 April 2026 (UTC)
    • Review needed

    • Nomination: A two-axle Mercedes-Benz Integro of the Austrian Bundesheer. --Aciarium 00:00, 23 April 2026 (UTC)
    • Review needed

April 22, 2026

    • Nomination: Titi Nicola at Wikiconf Argentina 2026, Buenos Aires, Argentina --Ezarate 23:04, 22 April 2026 (UTC)
    • Review needed

    • Nomination: Moscow - 2025 - Dome of the Bell Tower of Ivan the Great --Юрий Д.К. 21:13, 22 April 2026 (UTC)
    • Review
      Quality is fine of course, but I would crop it. Too much unnecessary information in the image. --Syntaxys 04:48, 23 April 2026 (UTC)
      ✓ Done --Юрий Д.К. 18:56, 23 April 2026 (UTC)
    • Nomination: Moscow - 2025 - Evening view of the Kremlin and the Taynitsky Garden from the Sofiyskaya Embankment --Юрий Д.К. 21:13, 22 April 2026 (UTC)
    • Review needed

    • Nomination: SAR exercise demonstration of Bundeswehr helicopters at ILA Berlin Air Show 2024 --MB-one 13:11, 22 April 2026 (UTC)
    • Review needed

    • Nomination: Telephone landline outlet an mounting points for a wall-mounted telephone in a Hotel in Berlin --MB-one 13:11, 22 April 2026 (UTC)
    • Review needed

    • Nomination: Remains of the former Stenhamra stenbrott (quarry) --ArildV 10:54, 22 April 2026 (UTC)
    • Review
      2 dust spots on the sky. Overall good. --Юрий Д.К. 21:19, 22 April 2026 (UTC)
    • Nomination: Turret at Vinohrady Market Hall, Prague, Czechia --JiriMatejicek 10:31, 22 April 2026 (UTC)
    • Review
      spot in the left of the sky --Mike1979 Russia 13:49, 22 April 2026 (UTC)
      Unable to fix it, sorry. --JiriMatejicek 08:54, 24 April 2026 (UTC)
    • Nomination: This is an upside-down version of the previous Xianqing Pavilion photo, to create an illusion that the fish are swimming in the sky. Just an experiment. I'm not sure if this modification works well. --Steven Sun 09:15, 22 April 2026 (UTC)
    • Review needed

    • Nomination: Pharmacy building at 18a, Abai Street. Qonaev, Almaty Region, Kazakhstan. --Красный 09:04, 22 April 2026 (UTC)
    • Review needed

    • Nomination: Manhole cover at Abai Street. Qonaev, Almaty Region, Kazakhstan. --Красный 09:04, 22 April 2026 (UTC)
    • Review needed

    • Nomination: The “Erlenbachwiesen - Rote Hecke” landscape conservation area north of Erlenbach near Kandel in the Southern Palatinate. --Syntaxys 07:14, 22 April 2026 (UTC)
    • Review needed

    • Nomination: The “Erlenbachwiesen - Rote Hecke” landscape conservation area north of Erlenbach near Kandel in the Southern Palatinate. --Syntaxys 07:14, 22 April 2026 (UTC)
    • Review needed

    • Nomination: Tours (Indre-et-Loire, France) - Mame mansion house --Benjism89 06:38, 22 April 2026 (UTC)
    • Review needed

    • Nomination: Saint-Jean-de-Maurienne (Savoie, France) - The cathedral (left) and the Correrie tower (right) at night --Benjism89 06:38, 22 April 2026 (UTC)
    • Review needed

    • Nomination: Alcazaba, Málaga, Spain --Poco a poco 06:37, 22 April 2026 (UTC)
    • Review
      Dust spot, see note --Benjism89 06:44, 22 April 2026 (UTC)
       Comment Dark, crooked or distorted IMO--Lmbuga 16:57, 22 April 2026 (UTC)
    • Nomination Castillo de Colomares, Benalmádena, Málaga, Spain --Poco a poco 06:37, 22 April 2026 (UTC)
    • Decline
      artefacts on the edges at the top of the gate (maybe from CA removal, or camera shake ?), and there is a strange veil (large dust spot) over the flowers at the bottom center-left --Benjism89 06:48, 22 April 2026 (UTC)
      I uploaded a new version, better, but I don't know whether good enough --Poco a poco 20:39, 22 April 2026 (UTC)
       Oppose A little better but this dust spot (if this whats it is) is really spoiling it, sorry --Benjism89 06:13, 23 April 2026 (UTC)
    • Nomination: Amsterdam-NL, churchtower (the Westerkerk) from the Westermarkt --Michielverbeek 05:57, 22 April 2026 (UTC)
    • Review needed

    • Nomination: Amsterdam-NL, church: the Onze-Lieve-Vrouwekerk --Michielverbeek 05:57, 22 April 2026 (UTC)
    • Review needed

    • Nomination: Triumph tulipa cultivar 'Uppsala' in the botanical garden in Munich, Germany --Kritzolina 05:22, 22 April 2026 (UTC)
    • Review needed

    • Nomination: Building at Lange Straße 19 in Riedlingen, Baden-Württemberg, Germany. --Tournasol7 01:52, 22 April 2026 (UTC)
    • Review
      Sorry, but many of your recent images are IMO underexposed. This here at least 1 stop. Is your monitor too bright? --Syntaxys 04:31, 22 April 2026 (UTC)
    • Nomination: Window. Here on the wall. Santiago de Compostela, Galicia (Spain). --Lmbuga 01:02, 22 April 2026 (UTC)
    • Review needed

    • Nomination: Huron Street Bridge, Stratford, Ontario, 2025-08-04; road heading southeast --Crisco 1492 00:15, 22 April 2026 (UTC)
    • Review
       Comment Sorry, but in my opinion it needs more light in dark areas --Lmbuga 16:28, 22 April 2026 (UTC)
      Shadows increased. Thanks for the review. --Crisco 1492 00:05, 23 April 2026 (UTC)

April 21, 2026

    • Nomination: A water cannon of the Austrian tactical unit "WEGA" of the federal police, displayed during the Austrian national holiday of 2023. --Aciarium 21:34, 21 April 2026 (UTC)
    • Review needed

    • Nomination: The bullbar of an Achleitner PMV Survivor II of the Austrian tactical police unit "EKO Cobra". --Aciarium 21:34, 21 April 2026 (UTC)
    • Review needed

    • Nomination: Moscow - 2026 - Electric bike under the Crimean Bridge --Юрий Д.К. 20:24, 21 April 2026 (UTC)
    • Review needed

    • Nomination: Gonzalo Bazgan at Wikiconf 2026, Buenos Aires, Argentina --Ezarate 13:54, 21 April 2026 (UTC)
    • Review needed

    • Nomination: Kazybek Bi Street in Almaty, Kazakhstan --MB-one 13:28, 21 April 2026 (UTC)
    • Review needed

    • Nomination: Mural of "Gris plomo nunca más" ("Gray never lead again") a slogan and artistic action promoted by the Cromoactivismo collective, which proposes to reclaim public and symbolic space through color, opposing the monochrome associated with political violence, the memory of state terrorism and "pigmentocracy", Memory Park, Buenos Aires, Argentina --Ezarate 13:04, 21 April 2026 (UTC)
    • Review needed

    • Nomination A close-up, high-angle shot of several stacks of yellow gold bangles displayed in a jewelry store. The jewelry features repetitive, textured leaf-like or chevron patterns, characteristic of traditional and contemporary South Asian craftsmanship. The background shows more gold ornaments blurred with a shallow depth of field, emphasizing the texture of the foreground piecesI, the copyright holder of this work, hereby publish it under the following license:This media has been uploaded as a part of Project Korikath --A S M Jobaer 12:33, 21 April 2026 (UTC)
    • Decline Insufficient quality. DoF too low, especially with blurred bangles in the foreground. --Kritzolina 05:35, 24 April 2026 (UTC)
    • Nomination A close-up, high-angle shot of several stacks of yellow gold bangles displayed in a jewelry store. The jewelry features repetitive, textured leaf-like or chevron patterns, characteristic of traditional and contemporary South Asian craftsmanship. The background shows more gold ornaments blurred with a shallow depth of field, emphasizing the texture of the foreground piecesI, the copyright holder of this work, hereby publish it under the following license:This media has been uploaded as a part of Project Korikath --A S M Jobaer 12:33, 21 April 2026 (UTC)
    • Decline Insufficient quality. DoF too low, especially with blurred bangles in the foreground. --Kritzolina 05:35, 24 April 2026 (UTC)
    • Nomination: The Zügelstraße stop in Wörth am Rhein, with the S3 passing through to Germersheim. --Syntaxys 09:38, 21 April 2026 (UTC)
    • Review needed

    • Nomination: Pulley wheel on a ski lift. --DimiTalen 09:16, 21 April 2026 (UTC)
    • Review needed

    • Nomination: Église paroissiale Notre-Dame-des-Sables de Berck (Fresques murales) --JackyM59 08:30, 21 April 2026 (UTC)
    • Review needed

    • Nomination: Amsterdam-NL, Keizersgracht 62 to 86 --Michielverbeek 05:45, 21 April 2026 (UTC)
    • Review needed

    • Nomination: Amsterdam-NL, Keizersgracht 106 to 122 --Michielverbeek 05:45, 21 April 2026 (UTC)
    • Review
      Lovely cityscape, but the right part is blurry and white details of buildings are blown out. --Екатерина Борисова 01:10, 22 April 2026 (UTC)
      I have already tried to solve this problem, but it have not been enough --Michielverbeek 06:18, 22 April 2026 (UTC)
      I understand because I have similar problems from time to time. --Екатерина Борисова 02:25, 23 April 2026 (UTC)
    • Nomination: Amsterdam-NL, Keizersgracht 124 to 138 --Michielverbeek 05:45, 21 April 2026 (UTC)
    • Review needed

    • Nomination: Amsterdam-NL, Keizersgracht 142 to 158 --Michielverbeek 05:45, 21 April 2026 (UTC)
    • Review
      Lovely cityscape, but the right part is blurry and white details of buildings are blown out. --Екатерина Борисова 01:08, 22 April 2026 (UTC)
      I have already tried to solve this problem, but it have not been enough --Michielverbeek 06:18, 22 April 2026 (UTC)
    • Nomination: Double late tulipa cultivar 'Miranda' in the botanical garden in Munich, Germany --Kritzolina 05:13, 21 April 2026 (UTC)
    • Review needed

    • Nomination: Triumph tulipa cultivar 'Ile de France' in the botanical garden in Munich, Germany --Kritzolina 05:13, 21 April 2026 (UTC)
    • Review needed

    • Nomination: Triumph tulipa cultivar 'Washignton' in the botanical garden in Munich, Germany --Kritzolina 05:13, 21 April 2026 (UTC)
    • Review needed

    • Nomination: Close wing of Ethope himachala (Moore, 1858) - Dusky Diadem. By User:Lorensonowal --Atudu 02:08, 21 April 2026 (UTC)
    • Review needed

    • Nomination: Sphinx Statue in the Louvre Abu DhabiI. --Steven Sun 01:50, 21 April 2026 (UTC)
    • Review needed

    • Nomination: Boats on the Dubai Creek, near Al SeefI. --Steven Sun 01:08, 21 April 2026 (UTC)
    • Review needed

April 20, 2026

    • Nomination: Luisina Ferrante at Wikiconf 2026, Buenos Aires, Argentina --Ezarate 00:33, 21 April 2026 (UTC)
    • Review needed

    • Nomination: Fernando Archuby in his presentation at Wikiconf 2026 --Ezarate 00:05, 21 April 2026 (UTC)
    • Review needed

    • Nomination The statue of the Lion of Saint Mark inside the Vienna Central Station near an entrance --FlocciNivis 19:36, 20 April 2026 (UTC)
    • Decline
       Oppose Nor a chosen detail, neither the whole statue is pictured. Imho, the crop is not good enough for a quality image. --Harlock81 08:19, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
    • Nomination: Kids at Fajtův kopec near Velké Meziříčí, Czechia --RomanM82 15:37, 20 April 2026 (UTC)
    • Review needed

    • Nomination: Maserati Ghibli I 4900 SS at Classic-Gala 2025 --Alexander-93 15:31, 20 April 2026 (UTC)
    • Review needed

    • Nomination: Germany, Karthaus Abbey (Konz), Pietà in the church --Berthold Werner 14:56, 20 April 2026 (UTC)
    • Review needed

    • Nomination: An emergency vehicle (Volkswagen Crafter) of the search-and-rescue-dog division of the Austrian Red Cross. --Aciarium 00:01, 20 April 2026 (UTC)
    • Review needed

    • Nomination: Emergency vehicles (Volkswagen Caddy and Iveco Daily) of the Vienna distribution network operator "Wiener Netze". --Aciarium 00:01, 20 April 2026 (UTC)
    • Review needed

April 19, 2026

    • Nomination: Church of St. Margaret in Stara Łomnica 5 by User:Jacek Halicki--Boston9 14:22, 19 April 2026 (UTC)
    • Review needed

    • Nomination: Toyota Aygo X Hybrid in Filderstadt --Alexander-93 14:14, 19 April 2026 (UTC)
    • Review needed

    • Nomination: Tours (Indre-et-Loire, France) - House at Blanqui street 34 --Benjism89 08:28, 19 April 2026 (UTC)
    • Review needed

    • Nomination: Abbaye de Valloires - Bâtiments abbatiaux --JackyM59 08:16, 19 April 2026 (UTC)
    • Review
      Les bâtiments sont un peu sombres, je corrigerais l'exposition --Benjism89 08:33, 19 April 2026 (UTC)
      Un peu plus de lumière. C'est dommage de visiter une abbaye et un jardin remarquable un jour de grissaille.... ( A little more light would be nice. It's a shame to visit an abbey and its remarkable gardens on a gray day.) --JackyM59 12:29, 19 April 2026 (UTC)
      Mais tu peux peut-être augmenter un peu l'exposition dans ton logiciel de traitement ? --Benjism89 16:58, 21 April 2026 (UTC)
      Fringes or Cas on the roof, otherwise ok. --Sebring12Hrs 17:53, 23 April 2026 (UTC)
    • Nomination: Monumental fountain of Neptune, Carnot Square, Carcassonne, France --Poco a poco 07:52, 19 April 2026 (UTC)
    • Review
      maybe a recrop (if cropped) would make this picture more pleasant - the bottom cutoff and the not centered perspective are disturbing --Grunpfnul 15:54, 23 April 2026 (UTC)
    • Nomination: Double daffodil cultivar 'White Lion' in the botanical garden in Munich, Germany --Kritzolina 05:37, 19 April 2026 (UTC)
    • Review needed

    • Nomination Trumpet daffodil 'Primeur' in the botanical garden in Munich, Germany --Kritzolina 05:37, 19 April 2026 (UTC)
    • Decline
       Oppose Sorry: partly blurred (insufficient DoF) --F. Riedelio 14:30, 23 April 2026 (UTC)
    • Nomination: Saint Martin church in Altheim, Baden-Württemberg, Germany. --Tournasol7 01:11, 19 April 2026 (UTC)
    • Review
      Slightly dark even for november I think. --ArildV 08:16, 19 April 2026 (UTC)
      ✓ New version uploaded. --Tournasol7 21:48, 25 April 2026 (UTC)

April 18, 2026

    • Nomination: A male bumblebee (Bombus monozonus) visiting azalea flowers (Rhododendron rubropilosum) near Mount Xiaobajian. -- Tiouraren 14:46, 18 April 2026 (UTC)
    • Review
      There are halos around objects, possibly due to artificial bokeh. --Aciarium 18:53, 18 April 2026 (UTC)
    • Nomination: Siebenbrüderhöhle in the Kröllwitz district in Halle (Saale) --Romzig 08:39, 18 April 2026 (UTC)
    • Review needed

    • Nomination: Ria Formosa seen from Ludo Trail near the airport of Faro, Portugal --Kritzolina 08:13, 18 April 2026 (UTC)
    • Review needed

    • Nomination: Ria Formosa seen from Ludo Trail near the airport of Faro, Portugal --Kritzolina 08:13, 18 April 2026 (UTC)
    • Review needed

    • Nomination: 6 Kościelna Street in Kłodzko 2 --Jacek Halicki 05:15, 18 April 2026 (UTC)
    • Review needed

    • Nomination: 6 Kościelna Street in Kłodzko 3 --Jacek Halicki 05:15, 18 April 2026 (UTC)
    • Review needed

    • Nomination: Villa, 1883 design. Karol Knaus, 9 Bogusławskiego street, Kraków, Poland --Igor123121 03:50, 18 April 2026 (UTC)
    • Review needed

    • Nomination: Rocky scrubland vegetation near Macherla, on the Deccan Plateau --I.Mahesh 03:34, 18 April 2026 (UTC)
    • Review
      The picture is high valuable, imho, but the depth of field is a bit too narrow. The rocks at the centre of the image are in focus, but maybe only the shrub closer to them is in focus too. Other opinions? --Harlock81 08:11, 25 April 2026 (UTC)

April 17, 2026

    • Nomination: Siebenbrüderhöhle in the Kröllwitz district in Halle (Saale) --Romzig 20:50, 17 April 2026 (UTC)
    • Review needed

    • Nomination: Eurasian blackcap (Sylvia atricapilla) --Romzig 20:50, 17 April 2026 (UTC)
    • Review
      background is blown out. Can you adjust light balance to improve the high contrast? --E bailey 17:17, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
    • Nomination: A Volkswagen T5 of the water management department of the City of Vienna. --Aciarium 19:47, 17 April 2026 (UTC)
    • Review needed

    • Nomination: A Ford Transit pickup of the water management department of the City of Vienna. --Aciarium 19:47, 17 April 2026 (UTC)
    • Review needed

    • Nomination: Worker walking in a new HL-LHC tunnel at CERN - from WSC (by Mmma98) --GioviPen 19:19, 17 April 2026 (UTC)
    • Review
      Very good photo, but quite a lot of noise. --Aciarium 23:24, 17 April 2026 (UTC)
    • Nomination: Azulejo street sign in Rua do Municipio, Faro, Portugal --Kritzolina 16:04, 17 April 2026 (UTC)
    • Review
      Needs a tighter crop (without this distracting thing at the top left), perspective correction and perhaps a higher exposure --Benjism89 17:13, 17 April 2026 (UTC)
    • Nomination: Hukvaldy, Frýdek-Místek District, Moravian-Silesian Region, Czechia --Plánovací kalendář 07:43, 17 April 2026 (UTC)
    • Review needed

    • Nomination: Baška, Frýdek-Místek District, Moravian-Silesian Region, Czechia --Plánovací kalendář 07:43, 17 April 2026 (UTC)
    • Review needed

    • Nomination: A Buddha statue in a Temple of the Western Paradise in Beihai Park, Beijing --Ermell 05:33, 17 April 2026 (UTC)
    • Review needed

    • Nomination: Gates and passageways in the Forbidden City in Beijing --Ermell 05:33, 17 April 2026 (UTC)
    • Review
      Visible red chromatic aberration, fixable? --F. Riedelio 14:24, 23 April 2026 (UTC)
    • Nomination: Esztergom Town Hall at night (by Julesvernex2) --Sebring12Hrs 05:26, 17 April 2026 (UTC)
    • Review
      A little extra noise reduction would make this better IMO --Benjism89 06:36, 17 April 2026 (UTC)
    • Nomination: Tenement house, 60 Józefa Dietla street, Kraków, Poland --Igor123121 03:50, 17 April 2026 (UTC)
    • Review
      PC is needed. Brown halo around branches and antenna. --Sebring12Hrs 06:28, 22 April 2026 (UTC)

April 16, 2026

    • Nomination: Abbaye de Saint-Valery-sur-Somme (logis abbatial) --JackyM59 19:01, 16 April 2026 (UTC)
    • Review
      CA in the trees --Plozessor 04:06, 17 April 2026 (UTC)
      Is that better? Thank you --JackyM59 07:26, 17 April 2026 (UTC)
      @JackyM59: There are still purple fringes. --Plozessor 17:57, 18 April 2026 (UTC)
    • Nomination Gabriel on the bow of the Fryderyk Chopin, next to a Flemish rope coil, Doca de Alcântara, Lisbon, Portugal (by Julesvernex2) --Sebring12Hrs 17:21, 16 April 2026 (UTC)
    • Decline
       Oppose Sorry, technically a good picture, but "Gabriel" is not an appropriate subject for Commons IMO. --Plozessor 04:14, 24 April 2026 (UTC)
    • Nomination: La Belle-Croix Tollhouse — Baidax 11:27, 16 April 2026 (UTC)
    • Review
      Would look a lot better with a slight increase in brightness IMO, and perspective correction --Plasmium 15:01, 17 April 2026 (UTC)

April 15, 2026

    • Nomination Interior of St Luke's Church, Barton Hill, Bristol, from the gallery --Plasmium 18:22, 15 April 2026 (UTC)
    • Decline
       Oppose Sorry: noise in the shadow areas and blown-out highlights. --F. Riedelio 14:13, 23 April 2026 (UTC)
    • Nomination Moravská Nová Ves a day after 2021 South Moravia tornado strike, Břeclav District, South Moravian Region, Czechia, 25 June 2021 --Plánovací kalendář 15:22, 15 April 2026 (UTC)
    • Decline
       Oppose Lost of dust spots in the sky, and overall not sharp enough --Plozessor 04:13, 24 April 2026 (UTC)
    • Nomination Alfa Romeo SZ at Classic-Gala Schwetzingen 2025 --MB-one 09:20, 15 April 2026 (UTC)
    • Decline
       Oppose Technically good, but the people directly behind the car are spoiling it. --Plozessor 04:13, 24 April 2026 (UTC)
    • Nomination 10 Stryjeńskiej Street in Kłodzko 2 by User:Jacek Halicki--Boston9 08:38, 15 April 2026 (UTC)
    • Decline
       Oppose There's something really wrong with the edge between the sky and the rest of the picture, also purple CA around the antenna etc. --Plozessor 04:13, 24 April 2026 (UTC)
    • Nomination Disocactus macranthus in the botanical garden of Munich, Germany --Kritzolina 06:25, 15 April 2026 (UTC)
    • Decline
       Oppose Sorry: partly blurred (insufficient DoF) --F. Riedelio 14:16, 23 April 2026 (UTC)

April 13, 2026

    • Nomination: Jules and Gabriel on a stroller, Lisbon, Portugal (by Julesvernex2) --Sebring12Hrs 20:49, 13 April 2026 (UTC)
    • Review
       Underexposed --Aciarium 00:38, 19 April 2026 (UTC)
    • Nomination: A view of the Gollenberg wind farm (Southern Palatinate) in the shimmering late-summer heat. --Syntaxys 13:20, 13 April 2026 (UTC)
    • Review
      Nice scene and composition, but sadly  Level of detail too low --Aciarium 00:38, 19 April 2026 (UTC)
      Thanks, I guessed that. It's the summer heat air shimmering at this distance. You can't prevent this like water drops when shooting in the rain. --Syntaxys 06:01, 20 April 2026 (UTC)

April 12, 2026

    • Nomination: The Kolbenberg in the Taunus seen from the Weiße Mauer, Hesse, Germany --Milseburg 09:46, 12 April 2026 (UTC))
    • Review
      This should be QI but the sharpening is too extreme - it is even affecting the noise in the image. Would look a lot better with that tuned down. --Plasmium 11:50, 16 April 2026 (UTC) @Plasmium: Thanks for the review. The first version was a failure, probably due to shaky camera footage. I made a new version today.--Milseburg 18:05, 18 April 2026 (UTC) Question--Milseburg 20:53, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
    • Nomination: Jules and Gabriel walking past Instituto Nacional de Estatística, Lisbon, Portugal (by Julesvernex2) --Sebring12Hrs 09:20, 12 April 2026 (UTC)
    • Review
      Artistic choice of DoF and composition. Could you please remove the chromatic aberration on the fence? --Aciarium 14:01, 18 April 2026 (UTC)

April 9, 2026

    • Nomination: Angurukaramulla Buddhist Temple in Negombo, Sri Lanka --Carschten 08:26, 9 April 2026 (UTC)
    • Review
      Purple CA in the trees on the left, should be easily fixable? Otherwise looks good! --Mike Peel 19:58, 17 April 2026 (UTC)

Consensual review

Rules

These rules are in accordance with the procedures normally followed in this section. If you don’t agree with them please feel free to propose changes.

  • To ask for consensual review, just change the /Promotion, /Decline to /Discuss and add your comments immediately following the review. An automatic bot will move it to the consensual review section within one day. Alternatively move the image line from the main queue to Consensual Review/Images and follow the instructions in the edit window.
  • You can move an image here if you contest the decision of the reviewer or have doubts about its eligibility (in which case an 'oppose' is assumed). In any case, please explain your reasons. Our QICBot will move it for you. When the bot moves it, you might have to revisit the nomination and expand your review into the Consensual Review format and add "votes".
  • The decision is taken by majority of opinions, including the one of the first reviewer and excluding the nominator's. After a minimum period of 48 hours since the last entry, the decision will be registered at the end of the text using the template {{QICresult}} and then executed, according to the Guidelines.
Using {{support}} or {{oppose}} will make it easier to count your vote.
Votes by anonymous contributors aren't counted
  • In case of draw, or if no additional opinions are given other than the first reviewer's, the nomination can be closed as inconclusive after 8 days, counted from its entry.
  • Turn any existing comments into bullet points—add  Oppose and  Support if necessary.
  • Add a comment explaining why you've moved the image here - be careful to stay inside the braces.
  • Preview and save with a sensible edit summary like "+Image:Example.jpg".



File:Józefa_Dietla_Street,...._buildings._Kraków..Poland.jpg

  • Nomination Józefa Dietla Street, buildings, Kraków, Poland --Igor123121 03:54, 24 April 2026 (UTC)
  • Discussion
  •  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:16, 24 April 2026 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Overall good, but central building is blown out. Can you fix it, please? --Екатерина Борисова 02:32, 25 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Tours_-_Jardin_François_Sicard.jpg

  • Nomination Tours (Indre-et-Loire, France) - François Sicard public garden in late afternoon, with the cathedral towers in the background --Benjism89 05:53, 21 April 2026 (UTC)
  • Discussion
     Oppose Strong contrast. Unnatural towers and upper side of the buildings. In real life, they don’t look like that, nor do they resemble what you see --Lmbuga 12:50, 21 April 2026 (UTC)
    I'm not really sure what you mean, these buildings do look this way, although late afternoon light makes them warmer. It's indeed a very contrasted scene. I've reduced a bit the contrast, hope you find it better now --Benjism89 16:55, 21 April 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support Very beautiful colors and lights. Sharp at normal size. --Sebring12Hrs 06:23, 22 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Irnsum,_dorp_in_de_gemeente_Leeuwarden._18-03-2026._(actm.)_30.jpg

File:Hortus_Haren_(Groningen)_13-12-2025._(actm.)_21.jpg

  • Nomination Hortus Haren. Overview photo of the semi-open part of the hortus.
    --Agnes Monkelbaan 04:13, 21 April 2026 (UTC)
  • Discussion
     Support Good quality. --XRay 04:32, 21 April 2026 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Igor123121 05:54, 21 April 2026 (UTC)
     Oppose Multiple purple fringes on branches, overexposed background. --Екатерина Борисова 01:14, 22 April 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support Some noise, but overall good enough quality. I think searching through background branches for a hint of purple (which I honestly don't really see) and calling it CA is a bit of pixel peeping --Jakubhal 19:21, 23 April 2026 (UTC)
  •  Comment I'm surprised at you guys. Much better quality photos are rejected here because of little noise or half degree tilt, while this one with clearly visible issues is going great. Jakubhal, do you really not see CA's on the right side - not somethere in the background, but right here in front? Very strange. I have a feeling that I did something wrong in QI project, and therefore you all vote not for this photo as such, but against my opinion. I hope this feeling is wrong. -- Екатерина Борисова 03:32, 24 April 2026 (UTC)
  •  Comment I've been active in QIC for a very long time and until recently I have not seen images rejected for such minor fringing on thin branches. This is a normal artifact in high-contrast situations and is clearly negligible here. The effect is limited to fine details against the sky and does not impact the overall image quality in any meaningful way. Treating this as a reason for rejection sets an unrealistic standard that is not consistently applied in this project. I vote based solely on the image, not on who comments on it. However, I cannot help but notice that you have been consistently raising this kind of very minor fringing as a decisive issue recently. I believe that this does not reflect how QIC standards are normally applied. Jakubhal 04:25, 24 April 2026 (UTC)
  •  Comment I really think that purple fringes on branches spoil the image no matter how strong/minor they are (here they are visible even in thumbnail size) and I don't think that wishing they weren't in a photo is an unrealistic standard. Maybe I'm too strict about quality, but, actually, the QI project exists in order to choose quality photos, not just pretty ones. -- Екатерина Борисова 03:11, 25 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Brest_Hohalia_street_2024-12-25_4092.jpg

File:Amsterdam,_Herengracht_2tm10_met_RM1693tm5_IMG_0904_2026-04-06_09.42.jpg

  • Nomination Amsterdam-NL, Herengracht 2 to 10 --Michielverbeek 15:44, 19 April 2026 (UTC)
  • Discussion
     Support Good quality. --JackyM59 17:00, 19 April 2026 (UTC)
     Oppose Not sharp rnough, and the right side is blurry, sorry. --Екатерина Борисова 01:25, 22 April 2026 (UTC)
     Comment Focus is to the houses at Herengracht 2 to 10, not to the right part --Michielverbeek 17:54, 22 April 2026 (UTC)

File:2025_Pomnik_św._Jana_Nepomucena_w_Starej_Łomnicy_(7).jpg

File:Half_geopende_bloemknop_van_een_Bostulp_(Tulipa_sylvestris)._12-04-2026_(d.j.b.).jpg

  • Nomination Half-opened flower bud of a woodland tulip (Tulipa sylvestris). --Famberhorst 04:19, 20 April 2026 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality. --Igor123121 05:04, 20 April 2026 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I disagree. I know that it may be quite difficult to take images of this plant species. However, most of the flower is quite blurry, except for the spot where the stem is attached to the flower and also some minor parts in the background. --Robert Flogaus-Faust 15:47, 20 April 2026 (UTC)
  •  Oppose low DOF per Robert. --Smial 15:58, 23 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Crested_Lark_in_Tal_Chhapar_Sanctuary_November_2025_by_Tisha_Mukherjee_01.jpg

  • Nomination Crested Lark (Galerida cristata) in Tal Chhapar Sanctuary, Rajasthan, India. --Tisha Mukherjee 09:18, 19 April 2026 (UTC)
  • Discussion
  •  Oppose  Level of detail too low --Aciarium 12:44, 19 April 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support Looks o.k. to me. --Ermell 15:35, 19 April 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support I agree with Ermell. --Harlock81 21:37, 24 April 2026 (UTC)
  •  Oppose agree with Aciarium. Image guidelines state: Images should not be downsampled (sized down) in order to appear of better quality. This is a 24MP camera and this image is only 3.5MP. --E bailey 17:13, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
  •  Weak support I don't think this image is downsampled. It was taken with an 800 mm lens, likely from a considerable distance. The relatively small size is probably due to cropping rather than downsampling. That said, my support is only weak, as the final resolution is indeed quite low. Jakubhal 17:51, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
    • Whether it’s heavy cropping or downsampling, in the end there’s less information for archival preservation. It’s not clear to me that this was downsampled. I’ll adjust my feedback and say that I’m more being critical of the relatively low resolution and level of detail which Aciarum pointed out. Heavy cropping has a disadvantage for the project’s archival purposes. I guess I’m re-opening the 2MP rule for debate. I don’t find this shot “hard to take” and would think it could be achieved with higher resolution. -- E bailey 19:23, 25 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Path_to_Philopappou_Hill.jpg

  • Nomination Path to Philopappou Hill --Kallerna 07:22, 16 April 2026 (UTC)
  • Discussion
  •  Oppose Poor lighting. --TheBritinator 09:02, 17 April 2026 (UTC)
  • Yeah, the backlight is the idea of the photo... --Kallerna 12:44, 17 April 2026 (UTC)
  •  Comment Please do not reset to "/Nomination" once there is a vote. I assume that the author wishes to challenge the opposing vote so that it should be moved to CR. --Robert Flogaus-Faust 19:50, 17 April 2026 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Maybe it is a problem in the coding, I just wanted to add a comment. --Kallerna 20:04, 17 April 2026 (UTC)
    •  Comment Vote stricken. You are not supposed to vote for or against your own photos. --Robert Flogaus-Faust 12:48, 18 April 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support Good for me – Julian Lupyan 08:24, 18 April 2026 (UTC)

File:2025_Figura_Trójcy_Świętej_w_Kłodzku_(4).jpg

  • Nomination Holy Trinity statue in Kłodzko 4 --Jacek Halicki 07:13, 16 April 2026 (UTC)
  • Discussion
  •  Oppose Why nominate 4 photos of same statue? --Kallerna 07:23, 16 April 2026 (UTC)
  • Please discussion --Jacek Halicki 11:08, 16 April 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support Good quality. No limits. --Lvova 15:19, 16 April 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support Images are clearly different and there is no limit on subject --Jakubhal 19:34, 16 April 2026 (UTC)
  • @Kallerna: Is it not forbidden to nominate multiple images of the same subject as long as they are different. This is not FP. --Plozessor 04:01, 18 April 2026 (UTC)
    • Out of 4 nominated pictures, two were almost identical. It is not forbidden to nominate, but IMO it is stupid and also it is not forbidden decline a nomination because of this. -Kallerna 08:51, 18 April 2026 (UTC)
      • I am strongly against the word 'stupid' as an argument, as far as it is a chance that it can be used mirrored. Lvova 11:01, 18 April 2026 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Disturbing background --Smial 03:29, 19 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Rimac_Nevera_R,_Auto_2024,_Zurich_(PANA0627).jpg

  • Nomination: Bugatti-Rimac's director of design Frank Heyl presents the Rimac Nevera R at Auto Zürich 2024 --MB-one 11:47, 14 April 2026 (UTC)
  • Review
  •  Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 13:29, 14 April 2026 (UTC)
  •  per rules Underexposed & already several promoted QIs from same occasion. --Kallerna 16:35, 16 April 2026 (UTC)
    • ✓ Done raised exposure. Thanks for the review. --MB-one 13:46, 25 April 2026 (UTC)

File:2025_Kłodzko,_ul._Daszyńskiego_8a_(3).jpg

  • Nomination 8a Daszyńskiego Street in Kłodzko 3 by User:Jacek Halicki--Poconaco 06:14, 7 April 2026 (UTC)
  • Discussion
  •  Oppose Halves of cars are too disturbing. --Екатерина Борисова 02:34, 15 April 2026 (UTC)
  • I disagree --Jacek Halicki 01:49, 17 April 2026 (UTC)
  • @Екатерина Борисова: I removed the cars.--Jacek Halicki 08:13, 17 April 2026 (UTC)
  • Amazing improvement, thank you! I removed my opposing vote. I'm not sure I can support the image instead, but I think it's good now. -- Екатерина Борисова 03:02, 18 April 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support OK Юрий Д.К. 15:25, 18 April 2026 (UTC)
  • Strong  Oppose Fake paving. The white car has damaged tyres and rims; the rear axle is bent, and the side profile looks odd around the rear doors too. A crash-damaged car hastily patched up? The chrome trim on the roof of the dark car on the left has come loose and is hanging in mid-air. The AI has clearly messed up there. My very personal opinion: I don’t want to see this sort of thing on Commons. I’ve got nothing against minor touch-ups, nothing against artistic experiments, but I can’t see any artistic intent in this photo. The photo is clearly documentary in nature, and in such cases, large-scale manipulations like this are an absolute no-go. Why would anyone do that? I just don’t get it. I’m too old for this kind of rubbish. Is some stupid QI badge worth more than Wikipedia’s credibility? --Smial 04:07, 19 April 2026 (UTC)
  • Wow, that's an analysis! I don't really know much about photographing cars, and I hadn't thought about AI at all. The photo looks spectacular now, but I agree that misleading is not good. -- Екатерина Борисова 03:33, 20 April 2026 (UTC)
  •  Strong oppose per Smial, even though I do not know whether the author used AI. This is a very strongly retouched photo that introduced obvious mistakes. The dark line on the pavement in front of the white car is yet another peculiarity, with abrupt changes and some blurry parts. This image should be marked with the template {{Retouched|1=what was done here}} and it is clearly not QI. In fact, reversion to the original version might be even better, though that version may not be QI either. --Robert Flogaus-Faust 08:54, 21 April 2026 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I think the roof strip of the removed car that was on the left, now hanging in the air, is also a peculiarity. I agree with the previous reviewers that this is probably a poorly done AI correction Jakubhal 04:11, 23 April 2026 (UTC)
  •  Comment Why not restore the original version and just crop the foreground (then the car in the lower right corner will disappear by itself, no need for AI)?--ArildV 07:27, 24 April 2026 (UTC)

審査の期限（推薦から8日間）

  • 4月 18 日 （土） → 4月 26 日 （日）
  • 4月 19 日 （日） → 4月 27 日 （月）
  • 4月 20 日 （月） → 4月 28 日 （火）
  • 4月 21 日 （火） → 4月 29 日 （水）
  • 4月 22 日 （水） → 4月 30 日 （木）
  • 4月 23 日 （木） → 5月 01 日 （金）
  • 4月 24 日 （金） → 5月 02 日 （土）
  • 4月 25 日 （土） → 5月 03 日 （日）
  • 4月 26 日 （日） → 5月 04 日 （月）