…Requirements for Uniform Resource Names" [ RFC1737 ]. This document obsoletes [ RFC2396 ], which merged "Uniform Resource Locators" [ RFC1738 ] and "Relative Uniform Resource Locators" RFC1808 ] in order to define a single, generic syntax for all URIs. It obsoletes [ RFC2732 ], w…

…MUST strip or add the BOM, respectively. . Fragment Identifiers Section 4.1 of [RFC2396] notes that the semantics of a fragment identifier (the part of a URI after a "#") is a property of the data resulting from a retrieval action, and that the format and interpretation of fragme…

…al Requirements for Uniform Resource Names" [RFC1737]. This document obsoletes [RFC2396], which merged "Uniform Resource Locators" [RFC1738] and "Relative Uniform Resource Locators" [RFC1808] in order to define a single, generic syntax for all URIs. It obsoletes [RFC2732], which …

…Requirements for Uniform Resource Names" [ RFC1737 ]. This document obsoletes [ RFC2396 ], which merged "Uniform Resource Locators" [ RFC1738 ] and "Relative Uniform Resource Locators" RFC1808 ] in order to define a single, generic syntax for all URIs. It obsoletes [ RFC2732 ], w…

RFC 2396 - Uniform Resource Identifiers (URI): Generic Syntax (RFC2396) RFC 2396 - Uniform Resource Identifiers (URI): Generic Syntax faqs.org RFC 2396 - Uniform Resource Identifiers (URI): Generic Syntax Internet RFC Index Usenet FAQ Index Other FAQs Documents Tools Search FAQs …

…tifies a consistent part of a representation." Last paragraph of section 4.1 in RFC2396 says (trailing clause): A fragment identifier is only meaningful when a URI reference is intended for retrieval and the result of that retrieval is a document for which the identified fragment…

…efinition of URI and URI references technology exists in a specification called RFC2396 entitled “Uniform Resource Identifiers (URI): Generic Syntax.” Let us create a simple definition and give examples of possible problems that arise from this definition: The value of the attrib…

… on which all of the software that successfully drives the Web is built, is in [RFC2396] . This formal definition has no notion of a "home" or "portal" page, nor does any of the vast amount of software deployed to process URIs. Thus, from the point of view of the underlying techn…

…attribute takes precedence. C.8. Fragment Identifiers In XML, URI -references [ RFC2396 ] that end with fragment identifiers of the form "#foo" do not refer to elements with an attribute name="foo" ; rather, they refer to elements with an attribute defined to be of type ID , e.g.…

…he xml:lang attribute takes precedence. C.8 Fragment Identifiers In XML, URIs [ RFC2396 ] that end with fragment identifiers of the form "#foo" do not refer to elements with an attribute name="foo" ; rather, they refer to elements with an attribute defined to be of type ID , e.g.…

…attribute takes precedence. C.8. Fragment Identifiers In XML, URI -references [ RFC2396 ] that end with fragment identifiers of the form "#foo" do not refer to elements with an attribute name="foo" ; rather, they refer to elements with an attribute defined to be of type ID , e.g.…

…arly specified beyond US-ASCII; refer to section 2.1 of the URI specification [ RFC2396 ]. For query parts (parts after the '?') resulting from filling in an HTML form, the default is to use the character encoding of the form. The definition of the accept-charset attribute on the…

…he xml:lang attribute takes precedence. C.8 Fragment Identifiers In XML, URIs [ RFC2396 ] that end with fragment identifiers of the form "#foo" do not refer to elements with an attribute name="foo" ; rather, they refer to elements with an attribute defined to be of type ID , e.g.…

…attribute takes precedence. C.8. Fragment Identifiers In XML, URI -references [ RFC2396 ] that end with fragment identifiers of the form "#foo" do not refer to elements with an attribute name="foo" ; rather, they refer to elements with an attribute defined to be of type ID , e.g.…

…方を使うこと。 xml:lang 属性の値が優先する。 C.8 フラグメント識別子 XMLでは、 "#foo" という形式のフラグメント識別子で終わる URI RFC2396 ] は、 name="foo" という属性をもつ要素を参照するのではない。それよりも、たとえばHTML4の id 属性といったような、 ID 型として定義されている属性をもつ要素を参照するのである。多くの既存のHTMLクライアントは、このような ID 型属性の使用法をサポートしていないので、最大の前方互換性と後方互換性とを保証するために、これらの属性の両方について同一の値を補っても…