…方を使うこと。 xml:lang 属性の値が優先する。 C.8 フラグメント識別子 XMLでは、 "#foo" という形式のフラグメント識別子で終わる URI RFC2396 ] は、 name="foo" という属性をもつ要素を参照するのではない。それよりも、たとえばHTML4の id 属性といったような、 ID 型として定義されている属性をもつ要素を参照するのである。多くの既存のHTMLクライアントは、このような ID 型属性の使用法をサポートしていないので、最大の前方互換性と後方互換性とを保証するために、これらの属性の両方について同一の値を補っても…

…yntax for the more general "URI" (Uniform Resource Identifier) is specified in [RFC2396]. The URI syntax is extremely general, with considerable variations permitted according to the type of "scheme" (e.g., "http", "ftp", "mailto") that is being used. While it is possible to use …

…ntax for the more general "URI" (Uniform Resource Identifier) is specified in [ RFC2396 ]. The URI syntax is extremely general, with considerable variations permitted according to the type of "scheme" (e.g., "http", "ftp", "mailto") that is being used. While it is possible to use…

…attribute takes precedence. C.8. Fragment Identifiers In XML, URI -references [ RFC2396 ] that end with fragment identifiers of the form "#foo" do not refer to elements with an attribute name="foo" ; rather, they refer to elements with an attribute defined to be of type ID , e.g.…

…:= *urlchar parameter := attribute "=" value where "urlchar" is imported from [ RFC2396 ], and "type", "subtype", "attribute" and "value" are the corresponding tokens from [ RFC2045 ], represented using URL escaped encoding of [ RFC2396 ] as necessary. Attribute values in [ RFC20…

…ntax for the more general "URI" (Uniform Resource Identifier) is specified in [ RFC2396 ]. The URI syntax is extremely general, with considerable variations permitted according to the type of "scheme" (e.g., "http", "ftp", "mailto") that is being used. While it is possible to use…

… := *urlchar parameter := attribute "=" value where "urlchar" is imported from [RFC2396], and "type", "subtype", "attribute" and "value" are the corresponding tokens from [RFC2045], represented using URL escaped encoding of [RFC2396] as necessary. Attribute values in [RFC2045] ar…

…ntax for the more general "URI" (Uniform Resource Identifier) is specified in [ RFC2396 ]. The URI syntax is extremely general, with considerable variations permitted according to the type of "scheme" (e.g., "http", "ftp", "mailto") that is being used. While it is possible to use…

…:= *urlchar parameter := attribute "=" value where "urlchar" is imported from [ RFC2396 ], and "type", "subtype", "attribute" and "value" are the corresponding tokens from [ RFC2045 ], represented using URL escaped encoding of [ RFC2396 ] as necessary. Attribute values in [ RFC20…

…ble of URI properties. (Done) 2. Action RF 2002/09/25: On the topic of revising RFC2396, indicate to the TAG what the relevant IETF fora are for input. RF: Join uri@w3.org (archive). I will send a message about the relevant issue when it comes up. Still open: 1. Finish discussion…

…ri@w3.org with appropriate tests and explanation, explaining how we interpreted RFC2396 and xml base 2002-03-22#5: jjc send message to uri list telling folks how we interpreted rfc 2396 and xml:base specs with appropriate text 2002-03-22#6: pats publish DT asWD Jema noted the fol…

…at resources are, aside from a reference to the lightweight definition found in RFC2396 ("anything that has identity"), so (e) This principle should simply be removed from Webarch forthwith. In fact, unless a new line of argument comes up to make me change my mind, I'm probably g…

…DOI 10.17487/RFC1738, December 1994, <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc1738>. [RFC2396] Berners-Lee, T., Fielding, R., and L. Masinter, "Uniform Resource Identifiers (URI): Generic Syntax", RFC 2396, DOI 10.17487/RFC2396, August 1998, <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2396>. [R…

… any relative IRI references are resolved to their absolute form. Note that in [RFC2396] URIs did not include fragment identifiers, but in [RFC3986] fragment identifiers are part of URIs. running text: Human text (paragraphs, sentences, phrases) with syntax according to orthograp…

…e on standards track. 1. Introduction URIs were previously defined in RFC 2396 [RFC2396], which was updated by RFC 3986 [RFC3986]. Those documents also specify how to define schemes for URIs. The first definition for many URI schemes appeared in RFC 1738 [RFC1738]. Because that d…