…nger exist. — Marco Aurelio 18:01, 2 February 2016 (UTC) On 10 August 2014, the Wikimedia Foundation added a " superprotect " right – granted to the "staff" global user group – which can make pages uneditable even for administrators, hence creating a new hierarchy where administr…

… and after this date. See current discussion . February Request bot flag for pl:Wikipedysta:Margosbot . Public anouncement: pl:Wikipedia:Bar#Status bota dla Wikipedysta:Margosbot . I'm inserting new interwiki links to articles. As for now I've put them into over 2000 articles (us…

… ( RFC on next steps), Summary of public discussions ( 2 online consultations , Wikimania workshop upcoming) Section in progress. This is a wiki, please edit to include links to any discussion that is not yet there. Editors spend a lot of time reading, writing, and reviewing mate…

User talk:Zblace - Meta-Wiki Jump to content From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki Latest comment: 25 days ago by Ainali in topic Wikimedians for Sustainable Development - March 2026 Newsletter Welcome to Meta! [ edit ] Latest comment: 11 years ago 1 comment 1 person i…

Wikisource:Scriptorium/Archives/2011 - Wikisource Jump to content From Wikisource Wikisource:Scriptorium Login link to secure login edit Would an admin be so kind to edit (create) Mediawiki:Loginend to add a link to the site's secure login . If it helps … enWS's . Thanks. 112.213…

Wikisource:Scriptorium/Archives/2008-04 - Wikisource, the free online library Jump to content From Wikisource Wikisource:Scriptorium Archives Latest comment: 17 years ago by T. Mazzei in topic Announcements Please do not post any new comments on this page. This is a discussion ar…

This is a project page to determine what action is required on the part of the Wikipedia community regarding the Stop Online Piracy Act (SOPA) and our response to it (if any). Jimmy Wales asked for community input on a possible database lock, similar to what the Italian Wikipedia…

This is a project page to determine what action is required on the part of the Wikipedia community regarding the Stop Online Piracy Act (SOPA) and our response to it (if any). Jimmy Wales asked for community input on a possible database lock, similar to what the Italian Wikipedia…

The main problem is documentation/annotation. Sometimes, I think that Wikisource is meant to be much more than just a reference library of texts: we should all be creating and working together on annotated versions of the text, something that the wiki can help. Otherwise, using a…

…, we determine which articles are to be featured articles (FAs) . FAs exemplify Wikipedia's very best work and satisfy the FA criteria . All editors are welcome to review nominations ; please see the review FAQ . Before nominating an article, nominators may wish to receive feedba…

…, we determine which articles are to be featured articles (FAs) . FAs exemplify Wikipedia's very best work and satisfy the FA criteria . All editors are welcome to review nominations ; please see the review FAQ . Before nominating an article, nominators may wish to receive feedba…

Since the 2013 RfC on Wikidata Phase 2 , using Wikidata in infoboxes has gone from the concept stage to more extensive mainspace experimental implementations. This had led to some controversies: some editors have been converting infoboxes to use Wikidata, believing use of Wikidat…

This discussion is being opened by the Wikimedia Foundation to determine how it can support the English Wikipedia community on its decision (if any) relating to the protest of the Stop Online Piracy Act . The purpose of this discussion is to gauge whether consensus is emerging fo…

…aborate. — Justin ( ko a vf ) ❤ T ☮ C ☺ M ☯ 00:10, 13 March 2026 (UTC) Reply On wikis, the custom is to take more into account than just the raw number of votes on either side. That's why the term " !vote " is used in discussions here. A bare "support" or "oppose" doesn't carry a…

…nge much, but I think we should use the latest Creative Commons license because Wikimedia may get in trouble otherwise. -- RafChem ( talk ) 16:26, 23 October 2016 (UTC) Reply First of all, Wikimedia won't get in trouble for sticking with the existing terms. Secondly: fair enough …