…, 218 , 219 , 220 , 221 , 222 , 223 , 224 , 225 , 226 , 227 , 228 I have been a Wikipedian for 11½ years, and an administrator for almost as long. However, I took an extended break from 2007 until recently, apart from a few sporadic edits. When I returned this year, I was shocked…
WP:CBAN currently says, Community sanctions may be discussed on the Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard (preferred) or on Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents. In a discussion that's happening now at WP:AN#Good Article ban proposal , there's confusion about what may …
…", either through continued editing or through discussion. Further information: Wikipedia:Editing policy Wikipedia:Be bold ; and Wikipedia:BOLD, revert, discuss cycle ఏకాభిప్రాయమనేది వికీపీడియా అంతటా అంతర్లీనంగా, నిరంతరంగా సాగే సాధారణ ప్రక్రియ. ఇతర వాడుకరులచే విభేదించబడని లేదా తి…
Wikipedia:共識 - 維基百科，自由嘅百科全書 跳去內容 出自維基百科，自由嘅百科全書 呢版係粵語維基百科正式 政策 ，維基友普遍接受， 通常 都要跟足。改佢之前要有 共識 先，重要嘅修改要響 討論版 傾過，同埋喺 報告版 宣布過。 捷徑 WP:CON 維基百科嘅政策 文章嘅標準 中立嘅觀點 有根有據 非原創研究 唔啱維基百科嘅嘢 講在生嘅人 同維基友合作 假定善意 文明嘅編輯方式 共識 唔好人身攻擊 處理拗撬 一句講嗮： 共識，係維基百科編者作出決議嘅基本模式。 共識 係維基百科編者作出決議嘅第一途徑。為實現呢個目的，「共識」嘅定義並唔單一，但…
… 禁制 傀儡 监督 IP封禁豁免 人事任免投票資格 基金會行動 志愿者回复团队 机器用户 行政员 模板編輯員 過濾器助理 活动组织者 過濾器編輯者 申請AutoWikiBrowser權限 參見 維基百科著作權 共识 是维基百科编者作出决议的第一途径。为实现这一目的，“共识”的定义并不单一，但共识总趋向于为实现和确保中立性与可供查证性，提供最好的方法。共识通常会在编者的编辑过程中自然达成：任何人都可以创建或增修一篇页面，而该页面的所有读者也可以选择去修改它或保持其不变。下文将讨论，编者无法通过编辑形成共识时在相关 讨论页 上谋求共识的过程。 什么是共识 共…
Information page on the process of requests for comment on Wikipedia Wikipedia information page This page describes the process, including instructions for how and why to create a request for comment ( RfC ), to participate in one, and to end one. RfC is one of several processes …
Information page on the process of requests for comment on Wikipedia Wikipedia information page This page describes the process, including instructions for how and why to create a request for comment ( RfC ), to participate in one, and to end one. RfC is one of several processes …
… expected to make a good-faith effort to reach a consensus that is aligned with Wikipedia's principles. Consensus is not necessarily unanimity . Ideally, it arrives with an absence of objections, but if this proves impossible, a majority decision must be taken. More than a simple…
…e apparent policy of using Harkavy romanization rather than YIVO (see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yiddish_orthography_and_typography#Transliteration - i.e. ch not kh, tz not ts?) (c) I thought that previous discussion had established that "Schmuck" is not "literally "jewel"" and…
Since the 2013 RfC on Wikidata Phase 2 , using Wikidata in infoboxes has gone from the concept stage to more extensive mainspace experimental implementations. This had led to some controversies: some editors have been converting infoboxes to use Wikidata, believing use of Wikidat…
…vidual talk page. Since this proposal involves a major change to Canadia pages, WikiProject Canada is the appropriate venue to allow the input of all Canadian users. This also aligns best with Wikipedia:LOCALCONSENSUS Poketama ( talk ) 18:51, 13 February 2026 (UTC) [ reply ] I se…
…articles. Given For a deletion review of a similar article that got deleted see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Comparison of smartphone brands. I'm sorry you do not want this article deleted but this is wikipedia policy that needs to be followed. I personally believe this to be …
… designed for the submission of general reflections on the arbitration process, Wikipedia in general, or other irrelevant and broad issues; and if you submit such content to this page, please expect it to be ignored or removed. General discussion of the case may be opened on the …